Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (9): 25030148-10    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25030148
  金属与金属基复合材料 |
质子交换膜燃料电池用Pt基合金催化剂的形貌设计、载体界面效应及抗失活机制研究进展
罗振旺1, 阴亚楠2, 张创3, 汪竞阳1,4,*, 刘德政3,*, 王诚2,*
1 湖北文理学院物理与电子工程学院,湖北 襄阳 441053
2 清华大学国家能源与环境研究院材料化学与新能源技术研究部,北京 100084
3 湖北文理学院智慧交通研究所,湖北 襄阳 441053
4 湖北文理学院低维光电材料与器件湖北省重点实验室,湖北 襄阳 441053
Research Advances in Morphological Design,Carrier Interface Effects,andAnti-deactivation Mechanisms of Platinum-based Alloy Catalysts forProton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells
LUO Zhenwang1, YIN Yanan2, ZHANG Chuang3, WANG Jingyang1,4,*, LIU Dezheng3,*, WANG Cheng2,*
1 School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang 441053, Hubei, China
2 Division of Materials Chemistry and New Energy Technology, INET, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
3 Institute of Intelligent Transportation, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang 441053, Hubei, China
4 Hubei Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang 441053, Hubei, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 49571KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 随着能源转型进程加速,质子交换膜燃料电池(PEMFC)因高能量密度和零排放特性成为新能源技术领域的研究热点。Pt基合金催化剂作为PEMFC阴极氧还原反应的核心材料,仍面临成本高、载体易腐蚀、抗中毒能力弱及金属溶解等问题,其大规模应用严重受限。近年来,众多研究者通过形貌调控、载体优化及合金组分设计等方法显著提升了Pt基合金催化剂的性能。本文从催化剂形貌设计、载体界面效应、抗失活机制三方面系统综述了Pt基合金催化剂的最新研究进展,总结了提升催化剂活性及耐久性能的策略,以期为低成本、高耐久PEMFC催化剂的开发提供有益的参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
罗振旺
阴亚楠
张创
汪竞阳
刘德政
王诚
关键词:  质子交换膜燃料电池  Pt基合金催化剂  形貌影响  载体效应  抗中毒  抗溶解    
Abstract: With the accelerating energy transition, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have emerged as a research focus in sustainable energy technologies due to their high energy density and zero-emission properties. Platinum-based alloy catalysts, serving as the core materials for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) at the cathodes of PEMFCs, still face critical challenges including high cost, support corrosion, weak poisoning resistance, and metal dissolution, which hinder their large-scale commercialization. In recent years, researchers have made significant strides in enhancing catalyst performance through morphology engineering, support optimization, and alloy composition design. The present review systematically examines recent advancements in Pt-based alloy catalysts for PEMFCs, with a focus on morphology design, support interface effects, and anti-deactivation mechanisms. Through comprehensive discussion the paper provides fundamental insights to guide the development of cost-effective, high-performance PEMFC catalysts with extended operational lifetimes.
Key words:  PEMFC    Pt-based alloy catalyst    morphological effect    carrier effect    poisoning resistance    dissolution resistance
收稿日期:  2026-05-10      出版日期:  2026-05-10      发布日期:  2026-05-18
ZTFLH:  TM911.42  
基金资助: 湖北省自然科学基金(2023AFB1045;2023AFD033;2024AFD046;2023AFD053);湖北隆中实验室自主创新项目(2022ZZ-03)
通讯作者:  *汪竞阳,博士,教授,硕士研究生导师,主要从事低维光电材料与器件的研究和开发。jy_wang1978@163.com
刘德政,博士,教授,硕士研究生导师,主要从事新能源数字孪生应用方向的研究。liudezheng126@126.com
王诚,博士,研究员,博士研究生导师,主要从事燃料电池及系统研究。wangjl@tsinghua.edu.cn   
作者简介:  罗振旺,湖北文理学院物理与电子工程学院硕士研究生,主要研究新能源系统、燃料电池催化剂。
引用本文:    
罗振旺, 阴亚楠, 张创, 汪竞阳, 刘德政, 王诚. 质子交换膜燃料电池用Pt基合金催化剂的形貌设计、载体界面效应及抗失活机制研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(9): 25030148-10.
LUO Zhenwang, YIN Yanan, ZHANG Chuang, WANG Jingyang, LIU Dezheng, WANG Cheng. Research Advances in Morphological Design,Carrier Interface Effects,andAnti-deactivation Mechanisms of Platinum-based Alloy Catalysts forProton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(9): 25030148-10.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25030148  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I9/25030148
1 Aili D, Cleemann L N, Li Q, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2012, 22(12), 5444.
2 Aili D, Zhang J, Jakobsen M T D, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2016, 4(11), 4019.
3 Lü X, Qu Y, Wang Y, et al. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 171, 1273.
4 Pu X, Wang H, Zhao D, et al. Small, 2019, 15(32), 1805427.
5 Liu W, Ru Q, Zuo S, et al. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 469, 269.
6 Guo Y F, Chen H C, Wang F C. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(13), 4630.
7 Liu M, Zhao Z, Duan X, et al. Advanced Materials, 2019, 31(6), 1802234.
8 Yoshida T, Kojima K. The Electrochemical Society Interface, 2015, 24(2), 45.
9 Li H, Zhao H, Tao B, et al. Nanomaterials, 2022, 12(23), 4173.
10 Sui S, Wang X, Zhou X, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017, 5(5), 1808.
11 Morozan A, Jégou P, Jousselme B, et al. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2011, 13(48), 21600.
12 Wang Y J, Long W, Wang L, et al. Energy & Environmental Science, 2018, 11(2), 258.
13 Shao M, Chang Q, Dodélet J P, et al. Chemical Reviews, 2016, 116(6), 3594.
14 Seselj N, Alfaro S M, Bompólaki E, et al. Advanced Materials, 2023, 35(40), 2302207.
15 Wang X, Orikasa Y, Uchimoto Y. Applied Catalysis B, 2016, 6(7), 4195.
16 Li M, Zhao Z, Cheng T, et al. Science, 2016, 354(6318), 1414.
17 Wu J, Yang H. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2013, 46(8), 1848.
18 van der Vliet D, Wang C, Debe M, et al. Electrochimica Acta, 2011, 56(24), 8695.
19 Zhang G, Lu W, Cao L, et al. Journal of Power Sources, 2016, 326, 23.
20 Chung H T, Cullen D A, Higgins D, et al. Science, 2017, 357(6350), 479.
21 Yang T, Cao G, Huang Q, et al. Journal of Power Sources, 2015, 291, 201.
22 Zhou X, Gan Y, Du J, et al. Journal of Power Sources, 2013, 232, 310.
23 Ramírez-Caballero G E, Ma Y, Callejas-Tovar R, et al. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2010, 12(9), 2209.
24 Zhao Y, Liu J, Zhao Y, et al. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2014, 16(36), 19298.
25 Wang X X, Sokolowski J, Liu H, et al. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2020, 41(5), 739.
26 Hou J, Yang M, Ke C, et al. EnergyChem, 2020, 2(1), 100023.
27 Lin R, Cai X, Hao Z, et al. Electrochimica Acta, 2018, 283, 764.
28 Gao S, Zhao H, Gao P, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2022, 14(30), 34750.
29 Wang J, Li B, Yang D, et al. RSC Advances, 2018, 8(33), 18381.
30 Sharma R, Morgen P, Chiriaev S, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2022, 14(44), 49658.
31 Cao F, Ding R, Rui Z, et al. Molecules, 2023, 28(2), 773.
32 Zhu F, Luo L, Wu A, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020, 12(23), 26076.
33 Okamoto H. Journal of Phase Equilibria and Diffusion, 2019, 40(5), 743.
34 Yu S, Chen L, Cheng N, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2023, 15(17), 21049.
35 Hornberger E, Klingenhof M, Polani S, et al. Chemical Science, 2022, 13(32), 9295.
36 Chen G, Yang X, Xie Z, et al. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2020, 562, 244.
37 Cai X, Lin R, Shen D, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(33), 29689.
38 Polani S, MacArthur K E, Kang J, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2022, 14(26), 29690.
39 Leteba G M, Wang Y C, Slater T J, et al. Nano Letters, 2021, 21(9), 3989.
40 Liu Z, Yin Y, Yang D, et al. RSC Advances, 2020, 10(11), 6287.
41 Tetteh E B, Gyan-Barimah C, Lee H Y, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2022, 14(22), 25246.
42 Chang F, Bai Z, Li M, et al. Nano Letters, 2020, 20(4), 2416.
43 Zhang C, Chen Z, Yang H, et al. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2023, 652, 1597.
44 Chen W, Gao W, Tu P, et al. Nano Letters, 2018, 18(9), 5905.
45 Qiao Z, Wang C, Zeng Y, et al. Small, 2021, 17(48), 2006805.
46 Duan H, Hao Q, Xu C. Journal of Power Sources, 2015, 280, 483.
47 Kakati B K, Kucernak A R. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 252, 317.
48 Mukundan R, Brosha E L, Garzon F H. Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 2003, 7(1), A5.
49 Zou X, Chen S, Wang Q, et al. Nanoscale, 2019, 11(42), 20115.
50 Jung W S, Popov B N. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(28), 23679.
51 Li C, Song L, Zhao X, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2022, 14(23), 26814.
52 Lim J, Shin H, Kim M, et al. Nano Letters, 2018, 18(4), 2450.
53 Louisia S, Thomas Y R, Lecante P, et al. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 2019, 10(1), 1251.
54 Uchida M. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, 2020, 21, 209.
55 Castanheira L, Dubau L, Mermoux M, et al. ACS Catalysis, 2014, 4(7), 2258.
56 ForouzanDeh F, Li X, Banham D W, et al. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2018, 165(6), F3230.
57 Yano H, Akiyama T, Watanabe M, et al. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2013, 688, 137.
58 Ji Y, Kwon O, Jeon O S, et al. Science Advances, 2023, 9(17), eadf4863.
59 Wang G, Zhao W, Mansoor M, et al. Nanomaterials, 2023, 13(21), 2818.
60 Manna N, Singh M, Kurungot S. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2023, 15(23), 28023.
61 Zhang L, Liu T, Liu X, et al. Nanoscale, 2024, 16(6), 2868.
62 Galdikas A, Descorme C, Duprez D. Solid State Ionics, 2004, 166(1-2), 147.
63 Liu X, Korotkikh O, Farrauto R. Applied Catalysis A, 2002, 226(1-2), 293.
64 Schubert M, Kahlert M, Gasteiger H, et al. Journal of Power Sources, 1999, 84(2), 175.
65 Nguyen T S, Morfin F, Aouine M, et al. Catalysis Today, 2015, 253, 106.
66 Lin Z, Sathishkumar N, Xia Y, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2024, 63, e202400751.
67 Zhang X, Zhang Y, Cheng C, et al. Nanoscale, 2020, 12(23), 12497.
68 Luo W, Jiang Y, Wang M, et al. RSC Advances, 2023, 13(7), 4803.
69 Elsaid K, Olabi A, Wilberforce T, et al. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 763, 144202.
70 Zhou J, Zeng C, Ou H, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 2021, 9(34), 11030.
71 Lu S, Eid K, Ge D, et al. Nanoscale, 2017, 9(3), 1033.
72 Huang L, Zaman S, Tian X, et al. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2021, 54(2), 311.
73 Liang W, Wang Y, Zhao L, et al. Advanced Materials, 2021, 33(30), 2100713.
74 Upadhyay S N, Pakhira S. Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 2021, 9(34), 11331.
75 Gong M, Xiao D, Deng Z, et al. Applied Catalysis B, 2021, 282, 119617.
76 Wang Z, Wang H, Zhang Z, et al. ACS Nano, 2017, 11(1), 163.
77 Xiao F, Wang Y C, Wu Z P, et al. Advanced Materials, 2021, 33(50), 2006292.
78 Rodríguez-Gómez A, Lepre E, Sánchez-Silva L, et al. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2022, 66, 168.
79 Guo J, Sun G, Shiguo S, et al. Journal of Power Sources, 2007, 168(2), 299.
80 Jain N, Roy A, Nair S. Nanoscale, 2019, 11(46), 22423.
81 Zhao W Y, Ni B, Yuan Q, et al. Advanced Energy Materials, 2017, 7(8), 1601593.
82 Zhang J, Qu X, Han Y, et al. Applied Catalysis B, 2020, 263, 118345.
83 Huang L, Zhang X, Wang Q, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2018, 140(3), 1142.
84 Kang Y S, Choi K H, Ahn D, et al. Journal of Power Sources, 2016, 303, 234.
85 Yang P, Yuan X, Hu H, et al. Advanced Functional Materials, 2018, 28(1), 1704774.
86 Min J, Jeffery A A, Kim Y, et al. Nanomaterials, 2019, 9(10), 1425.
87 Mohtadi R, Lee W K, van Zee J. Applied Catalysis B, 2005, 56(1-2), 37.
88 Shabani B, Hafftananian M, Khamani S, et al. Journal of Power Sources, 2019, 427, 21.
89 Shi W, Yi B, Hou M, et al. Journal of Power Sources, 2007, 164(1), 272.
90 Zamel N, Li X. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2011, 37(3), 292.
91 Garsany Y, Gould B D, Baturina O A, et al. Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 2009, 12(9), B138.
92 Ke S, Qiu L, Zhao W, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2022, 14(6), 7768.
93 Ke S, Cui B, Sun C, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2022, 14(42), 47765.
94 Gasteiger H A, Kocha S S, Sompalli B, et al. Applied Catalysis B, 2005, 56(1-2), 9.
95 Topalov A A, Katsounaros I, Auinger M, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2012, 51(50), 12613.
96 Mai H, Chen D, Tachibana Y, et al. Chemical Society Reviews, 2021, 50(24), 13692.
97 Mu R. Construction and reactivity of Pt-based Bi-component catalytic systems, Springer, DE, 2017.
98 Wang H, Lin R, Liu X, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2022, 14(24), 27891.
99 Li X, Duan X, Zhang S, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2024, e202400549.
100 Singh A K, Zhou L, Shinde A, et al. Chemistry of Materials, 2017, 29(23), 10159.
101 Wang Y, Yang H, Wang E. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2001, 497(1-2), 163.
102 Yang Z, Li M, Cui P, et al. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2018, 6(11), 14026.
103 Colic V, Bandarenka A S. ACS Catalysis, 2016, 6(8), 5378.
104 Kulkarni A, Siahrostami S, Patel A, et al. Chemical Reviews, 2018, 118(5), 2302.
105 Yang L, Bai J, Zhang N, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2024, 136(7), e202315119.
106 Xie X, Briegas-Martos V, Farris R, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2022, 15(1), 1192.
[1] 李涛. 氮化物涂层在PEMFC金属双极板领域的应用[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25010055-10.
[2] 李兰心, 潘牧, 郭伟. 质子交换膜燃料电池在线监测方法研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(6): 22070018-14.
[3] 逄芳钊, 姚陈思琦, 李安金, 赵盘巢, 李继刚, 易伟, 何建云, 蒋云波, 陈义武. 用于氧还原反应的PtNi合金催化剂研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(1): 20070194-9.
[4] 刘金伟, 畅丽媛, 王如志. 磷掺杂对碳载铂催化剂氧还原催化性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(21): 21040096-6.
[5] 洪亢, 朱凯, 刘声楚, 李赏, 潘牧. 电化学腐蚀对气体扩散层氧传质的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(20): 21030161-5.
[6] 张立昌, 蔡超, 谭金婷, 周江峰, 王园, 潘牧. 质子交换膜燃料电池微孔层在反极过程中的耐久性研究[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(14): 21030086-7.
[7] 吴国玉, 郑晔, 王明涌, 邢志军. Co修饰的碳载Pt纳米粒子催化剂的制备与表征[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(z2): 306-310.
[8] 赵秋萍, 钱庆一, 张斌, 牟志星, 张兴凯. 质子交换膜燃料电池金属双极板表面碳基防护镀层研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(Z1): 395-399.
[9] 吕路强, 沈骏, 向路, 刘双翼, 谢雄, 周猛兵. 碳基纳米结构作为燃料电池催化剂载体的研究进展*[J]. 材料导报, 2017, 31(21): 9-18.
[10] 蔡超, 陈亚男, 傅凯林, 潘牧. 质子交换膜燃料电池中Pt/C及Pt合金/C催化剂的衰退机制研究综述[J]. 《材料导报》期刊社, 2017, 31(17): 20-26.
[1] Yanzhen WANG, Mingming CHEN, Chengyang WANG. Preparation and Electrochemical Properties Characterization of High-rate SiO2/C Composite Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 357 -361 .
[2] Yimeng XIA, Shuai WU, Feng TAN, Wei LI, Qingmao WEI, Chungang MIN, Xikun YANG. Effect of Anionic Groups of Cobalt Salt on the Electrocatalytic Activity of Co-N-C Catalysts[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 362 -367 .
[3] Qingshun GUAN,Jian LI,Ruyuan SONG,Zhaoyang XU,Weibing WU,Yi JING,Hongqi DAI,Guigan FANG. A Survey on Preparation and Application of Aerogels Based on Nanomaterials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 384 -390 .
[4] Lijing YANG,Zhengxian LI,Chunliang HUANG,Pei WANG,Jianhua YAO. Producing Hard Material Coatings by Laser-assisted Cold Spray:a Technological Review[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 412 -417 .
[5] Zhiqiang QIAN,Zhijian WU,Shidong WANG,Huifang ZHANG,Haining LIU,Xiushen YE,Quan LI. Research Progress in Preparation of Superhydrophobic Coatings on Magnesium Alloys and Its Application[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 102 -109 .
[6] Wen XI,Zheng CHEN,Shi HU. Research Progress of Deformation Induced Localized Solid-state Amorphization in Nanocrystalline Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 116 -121 .
[7] Xing LIANG, Guohua GAO, Guangming WU. Research Development of Vanadium Oxide Serving as Cathode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 12 -33 .
[8] Hao ZHANG,Yongde HUANG,Yue GUO,Qingsong LU. Technological and Process Advances in Robotic Friction Stir Welding[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 128 -134 .
[9] Laima LUO, Mengyao XU, Xiang ZAN, Xiaoyong ZHU, Ping LI, Jigui CHENG, Yucheng WU. Progress in Irradiation Damage of Tungsten and Tungsten AlloysUnder Different Irradiation Particles[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 41 -46 .
[10] Fengsen MA,Yan YU,Jie ZHANG,Haibo CHEN. A State-of-the-art Review of Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Biomaterials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 76 -85 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed