Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (5): 25020050-8    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25020050
  生物质助力建筑材料可持续发展 |
酶促活性氧化镁碳化流态固化土
姬语洋1,2, 任冠洲1,2, 鞠鹏1,2, 樊恒辉1,2,*
1 西北农林科技大学水利与建筑工程学院,陕西 杨凌 712100;
2 西北农林科技大学岩土工程研究所/特殊岩土博物馆,陕西 杨凌 712100
Enzyme-induced Reactive Magnesium Oxide Carbonation for Fluidized Solidified Soil
JI Yuyang1,2, REN Guanzhou1,2, JU Peng1,2, FAN Henghui1,2,*
1 College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
2 Institute of Geotechnical Engineering/Museum of Problematic Rock and Soil, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 57599KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 在黄土地区道路与边坡加固工程中,由于存在异形空间和较大的回填深度,通常采用流态填充技术。然而,现有的流态填充材料普遍存在高能耗和较大的环境负担。本工作通过调节组分、尿素浓度和水固比,采用物理、化学、力学和微观试验,探索了一种基于酶促活性氧化镁碳化(EIMC)的环保型流态固化土技术。结果表明:生物固化浆液的水固比和尿素浓度与流动度正相关。固化后的试样最高无侧限抗压强度可达2.2 MPa,且在养护14 d后可达到28 d强度的90%。根据抗压强度与流动度的负相关性,确定了满足一般填充要求、异形空间填充要求的最佳水固比与尿素浓度,分别为0.48与1 mol/L、0.52与2 mol/L。矿物成分和微观结构分析表明,网状结构的球碳镁石胶结大量土颗粒,形成致密结构,是活性氧化镁生物碳化短期强度的主要来源。EIMC流态固化土的优异性能和环保特性为狭窄空间的回填和工程弃土的再利用提供了可持续的解决方案。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
姬语洋
任冠洲
鞠鹏
樊恒辉
关键词:  黄土  生物碳化  植物脲酶  氧化镁  流态固化土    
Abstract: In road and slope reinforcement projects in the Loess Plateau, irregular spaces and significant backfill depths often require the use of flowable fill technology. However, conventional flowable fill materials are typically associated with high energy consumption and substantial environmental impacts. This work explored an environmentally friendly fluidized solidified soil technique based on enzyme-induced magnesium carbonate (EIMC) carbonation, through adjusting its components, urea concentration, and water-to-solid ratio. Then, physical, chemical, mechanical, and microscopic tests were performed. The results show that the water-to-solid ratio and urea concentration in the bio-cementation slurry are positively correlated with flowability. The highest unconfined compressive strength of the cured samples reached 2.2 MPa, with 90% of the 28-day strength achieved after 14 days of curing. Based on the inverse correlation between compressive strength and flowability, the optimal water-to-solid ratios and urea concentrations for general and irregular space filling requirements are determined to be 0.48 (1 mol/L) and 0.52 (2 mol/L), respectively. Mineralogical and microstructural analyses reveal that the networked structure of magnesium carbonate binds numerous soil particles, forming a dense structure, which serves as the primary source of short-term strength in active magnesium carbonation. The outstanding perfor-mance and environmental benefits of EIMC fluidized solidified soil provide a sustainable solution for backfilling narrow spaces and reusing construction waste soil.
Key words:  loess    biocarbonation    plant urease    magnesium oxide    fluidized solidified soil
出版日期:  2026-03-10      发布日期:  2026-03-10
ZTFLH:  TU502+.4  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(52079116)
通讯作者:  *樊恒辉,博士,西北农林科技大学大水利与建筑工程学院研究员、博士研究生导师。目前主要从事特殊土的工程性质及其机理、土壤固化改良技术等方面的研究。yt07@nwsuaf.edu.cn   
作者简介:  姬语洋,西北农林科技大学水利与建筑工程学院硕士研究生,在樊恒辉研究员的指导下进行研究。目前主要研究领域为土体固化。
引用本文:    
姬语洋, 任冠洲, 鞠鹏, 樊恒辉. 酶促活性氧化镁碳化流态固化土[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 25020050-8.
JI Yuyang, REN Guanzhou, JU Peng, FAN Henghui. Enzyme-induced Reactive Magnesium Oxide Carbonation for Fluidized Solidified Soil. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(5): 25020050-8.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25020050  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I5/25020050
1 Zhang Z H. Acta Geologica Sinica, 1981, 55(4), 308(in Chinese).
张宗祜. 地质学报, 1981, 55(4), 308.
2 Fan H H, Zhao G W, Li H L. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(S1), 108 (in Chinese).
樊恒辉, 赵高文, 李洪良. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(S1), 108.
3 Chen Z H, Guo N. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1), 1(in Chinese).
陈正汉, 郭楠. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1), 1.
4 Ling T, Kaliyavaradhan S K, Poon C S. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 158, 535.
5 Liu S, Xu Y F, Zhan J S, et al. New Building Materials, 2022, 49(8), 167 (in Chinese).
刘帅, 徐玉飞, 詹进生, 等. 新型建筑材料, 2022, 49(8), 167.
6 Kaliyavaradhan S K, Ling T, Guo M, et al. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 241, 383.
7 Zhou Y X, Huo M H, Hou L, et al. Materials Reports, 2024, 38(15), 130 (in Chinese).
周永祥, 霍孟浩, 侯莉, 等. 材料导报, 2024, 38(15), 130.
8 Li Y X, Wang Q, Zhang Q C, et al. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(S1), 156 (in Chinese).
李雅曦, 王琴, 张秋臣, 等. 材料导报, 2023, 37(S1), 156.
9 Su Y, Yan N, Bai X Y, et al. Materials Reports, 2024, 38(9), 66 (in Chinese).
苏悦, 闫楠, 白晓宇, 等. 材料导报, 2024, 38(9), 66.
10 Benhelal E, Zahedi G, Shamsaei E, et al. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 51, 142.
11 Liu S Y, Li C. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(1), 148 (in Chinese).
刘松玉, 李晨. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(1), 148.
12 Yi Y, Lu K, Liu S, et al. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2016, 53, 314.
13 Pu L, Unluer C. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 120, 349.
14 Qin C, Liu S Y, Du G Y, et al. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2019, 27(6), 1302(in Chinese).
秦川, 刘松玉, 杜广印, 等. 工程地质学报, 2019, 27(6), 1302.
15 Xiao X, Goh L X, Unluer C, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 267, 121748.
16 Zhang J, Li Y, Luo Y, et al. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 2024, 42, 161.
17 Yang Y, Ruan S, Wu S, et al. Acta Geotechnica, 2021, 16, 1113.
18 Wang R, Tang C, Pan X, et al. Acta Geotechnica, 2023, 18, 1529.
19 Cuccurullo A, Gallipoli D, Bruno A W, et al. Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment, 2022, 30, 100230.
20 Zhang Q, Ye W M, Liu Z R, et al. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(2), 345 (in Chinese).
张茜, 叶为民, 刘樟荣, 等. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2), 345.
21 Larsen J, Poulsen M, Lundgaard T, et al. SPE Production and Operations, 2008, 23, 478.
22 Wen K, Li Y, Amini F, et al. Acta Geotechnica, 2020, 15, 17.
23 Dilrukshi R A N, Nakashima K, Kawasaki S. Soils and Foundations, 2018, 58, 894.
24 Ren G, Meng M, Fan H, et al. Acta Geotechnica, 2024, 19, 6661.
25 Zhang C, Sun Y, Yang Y, et al. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 2024, 13, 1567.
26 Dilrukshi R A N, Kawasaki S. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2016, 6, 1.
27 Cui H, Hoang T, Chu J, et al. Acta Geotechnica, 2024, 19, 4519.
28 Cui M, Fu X, Zheng J J, et al. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(11), 3027(in Chinese).
崔猛, 符晓, 郑俊杰, 等. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11), 3027.
[1] 姬仁林, 贾松岩, 唐家傲, 马亚丽, 郑强, 李雪. 磷酸盐调控高活性氧化镁制备硫氧镁水泥[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(3): 24120083-6.
[2] 栗东平, 角远烁, 张凯帆, 翟玉新, 钱增志, 王长龙, 黄天勇, 郑永超, 白云翼, 付兴帅, 田京雷, 孙宇佳. 煤气化渣基流态固化土的制备、性能及水化机理[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(3): 25020118-7.
[3] 梁志超, 任文渊, 李双村, 张爱军, 王毓国. 冻融和易溶盐对石灰固化伊犁黄土强度及水稳性的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(6): 23120250-8.
[4] 张凌凯, 丁旭升, 樊培培. 新疆北部重塑性黄土的力学特性规律及微观机制试验研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(3): 23090060-10.
[5] 殷溥隆, 李艳, 田勇, 翟越, 李乐, 何峻宇, 贾宇, 程禹翰. 冻融循环作用下黄土基水泥土三轴压缩力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(21): 24100069-8.
[6] 游庆龙, 熊秘, 陈世业, 黄之懿, 黄文旭, 赵胜前, 程明, 蒋勇. 基于Mohr-Coulomb和Drucker-Prager模型的黄土剪切特性研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(19): 24070047-6.
[7] 田威, 云伟, 党可欣, 李腾. 不同钙源EICP溶液改良路基黄土动力特性研究[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(9): 22110275-9.
[8] 苏悦, 闫楠, 白晓宇, 付林, 张启军, 梁斌, 王保栋, 王立彬, 张英杰, 张安琪. 预拌流态固化土的工程特性研究进展及应用[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(9): 23070212-7.
[9] 宋学锋, 王楠. 原位合成LDHs@地聚物复合材料的矿物组成及除磷效果[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(8): 22110080-6.
[10] 姚志华, 张建华, 辛建平, 穆锐. 风积砂-黄土混合料与钢界面的环形剪切力学特性[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(5): 23070012-8.
[11] 郭鑫, 苏宏玺, 赵鸿, 欧阳成伟, 强小虎, 黄大建. 海泡石/原位生成氢氧化镁对琼脂基气凝胶的性能影响研究[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(5): 21090278-8.
[12] 刘奎周, 张建仁, 田湘, 黄敦文, 彭晖. 利用H2O2发泡和碳化养护改善RMFC的固碳、力学和保温隔热性能[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(23): 22070288-8.
[13] 孙赫男, 关岩, 毕万利, 孙美硕. 烧结氧化镁粉的晶体特征对磷酸镁水泥力学性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(19): 20120126-6.
[14] 田威, 李腾, 贾能, 贺礼, 张雪珂, 张旭东. 木钙源EICP溶液固化路基黄土性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(15): 21050040-8.
[15] 侯鹏程, 王永亮, 韩志东, 王春锋. 聚碳硅烷协效氢氧化镁阻燃聚乙烯复合材料的残炭结构演变[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(z2): 525-528.
[1] TAO Lei, ZHENG Yunwu,DI Mingwei, ZHANG Yanhua, ZHENG Zhifeng. Preparation of Porous Carbon Nanofiber from Liquid Phenolic Resin and Its Characterization[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(10): 101 -106 .
[2] LI Hainan, MA Baoguo, TAN Hongbo, MEI Junpeng. Influence of TiO2 Nanoparticles on Hydration and Chloride Erosion of
Cement-fly Ash System
[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(4): 630 -633 .
[3] CHEN Xiao, BAI Xiaobo, WANG Hongtao, JI Gangchang. Microstructure and Properties of the Cermet Coating Prepared by Spraying
Multimodal WC-17Co Powders Using HVOF Technique
[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(4): 684 -688 .
[4] LI Wei, HAN Sen, HUANG Qibo, YAO Tengfei, XU Ouming. The Skeleton Characteristics of Coarse Aggregates in Granular Thin-layer Asphalt Mixture[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(4): 617 -624 .
[5] ZHANG Zhengyi, HAN Xiaoxia, WANG Chaohui, SUN Xiaolong. Cooling Performance of Road Cooling Coating Subjected to Simulated Pollution Condition[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(8): 1373 -1379 .
[6] LI Zhe, JIN Zuquan, SHAO Shuangshuang, XU Xiangbo. A Review on Reinforcement Corrosion Mechanics and Monitoring Techniques in Concrete in Marine Environment[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(23): 4170 -4181 .
[7] HE Yuandong, SUN Changzhen, MAO Weiguo, MAO Yiqi, ZHANG Honglong, CHEN Yanfei, PEI Yongmao, FANG Daining. Measurement of Transverse Piezoelectric Coefficients of Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 Thin Films by a Mechano-electrical Multiphysics Coupling, Bulge Test Method[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(15): 139 -144 .
[8] HAN Fangyu, LIU Jianzhong, LIU Jiaping, MA Biao, SHA Jianfang, WANG Xinglong. Study on Anchorage Behavior of Steel Bar in Ultra-high Performance Concrete[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(z1): 244 -248 .
[9] HAN Yinna, ZHANG Xiaojun, LI Long, ZHOU Dejing. A Review on Study of the Intermetallic Compounds at the Interface of Aluminum matrix Laminated Composites[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(7): 1198 -1205 .
[10] ZHANG Di, YANG Di, XU Cui, ZHOU Riyu, LI Hao, LI Jing, WANG Peng. Study on Mechanism of Highly Effective Adsorption of Bisphenol F by Reduced Graphene Oxide[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(6): 954 -959 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed