Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (6): 25030182-9    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25030182
  高分子与聚合物基复合材料 |
输氢管道非金属密封材料氢适应性研究
徐猛1, 曲士民2, 孙晨1,*, 吕亮亮2, 李鑫1, 那生巴图2, 鲁仰辉1
1 国家电投集团科学技术研究院有限公司,北京 102209;
2 内蒙古霍煤鸿骏铝电有限责任公司扎哈淖尔分公司,内蒙古 通辽 029123
Study on Hydrogen Compatibility of Non-metallic Sealing Materials for Hydrogen Transmission Pipelines
XU Meng1, QU Shimin2, SUN Chen1,*, LYU Liangliang2, LI Xin1, NASHENG Batu2, LU Yanghui1
1 State Power Investment Corporation Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102209, China;
2 Inner Mongolia Huomei Hongjun Aluminum and Electric Co., Ltd. Zhahanaoer Branch, Tongliao 029213, Inner Mongolia, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 78790KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 氢气在管道输送过程中,会渗透进入非金属密封材料内部,导致材料性能劣化,增加输送系统安全运行风险。本工作选取丁腈橡胶、氟橡胶、聚四氟乙烯三种典型非金属密封材料为研究对象,借助非金属渗透测试装置、高温高压老化装置,在压力6.3 MPa、温度60 ℃临氢环境下,开展了老化与抗爆实验。结果表明,三种非金属密封材料在压力6.3 MPa、温度60 ℃临氢环境下进行抗爆实验后,丁腈橡胶与聚四氟乙烯截面评价等级为0,氟橡胶截面评价等级为1,评价等级均小于3,性能均符合GB/T 34903-2017使用要求。三种非金属密封材料在压力6.3 MPa、温度60 ℃临氢环境下进行老化实验后,与室温、空气环境相比,丁腈橡胶在临氢环境下的拉伸强度增加了27.24%,拉断伸长率降低了22.21%;氟橡胶在临氢环境下的拉伸强度增加了21.44%,拉断伸长率降低了17.16%;聚四氟乙烯在临氢环境下的拉伸强度降低了16.29%,断后延伸率降低了30.65%;拉伸性能指标变化率均在50%以内,性能均符合GB/T 34903-2017使用要求。本工作阐明了临氢环境下非金属密封材料力学性能、密封性能等的退化规律,明确了临氢环境下非金属材料的密封适用性,构建了临氢环境密封件的密封性能评价方法,为管道输氢系统非金属密封材料的选型、服役性能评价提供了参考和依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
徐猛
曲士民
孙晨
吕亮亮
李鑫
那生巴图
鲁仰辉
关键词:  输氢管道  非金属密封材料  丁腈橡胶(NBR)  氟橡胶(FKM)  聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)  氢适应性    
Abstract: In the process of hydrogen transportation through pipelines, hydrogen permeation into non-metallic sealing materials induces material degradation, elevating operationalsafety risks. This study investigates three representative non-metallic sealing materials—nitrile rubber (NBR), fluororubber (FKM), and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) — through aging and rapid gas decompression (RGD) tests under hydrogen exposure at 6.3 MPa and 60 ℃, employing specialized non-metallic penetration test equipment and high-temperature/high-pressure aging apparatus. Post-RGD evaluation revealed cross-section assessment grades of 0 for both NBR and PTFE and 1 for FKM, all significantly below the critical threshold of 3 specified in GB/T 34903-2017, confirming compliance with acceptance criteria. Compared to ambient air conditions at room temperature, aging experiments demonstrated distinct tensile property variations under hydrogen exposure at 6.3 MPa and 60 ℃: NBR exhibited a 27.24% increase in tensile strength and a 22.21% decrease in elongation at break; FKM showed a 21.44% increase in tensile strength accompanied by a 17.16% reduction in elongation at break; PTFE displayed a 16.29% decrease in tensile strength and a 30.65% drop in elongation at break. Crucially, all tensile property fluctuations remained within the 50% tolerance limit mandated by GB/T 34903-2017. This systematic investigation elucidates degradation mechanisms of mechanical and sealing properties in hydrogen environments, establishes material suitability criteria for hydrogen service conditions, and develops a robust evaluation methodology for seal performance under hydrogen exposure. The findings provide critical insights for material selection and performance assessment of non-metallic seals in hydrogen pipeline systems, offering practical guidelines for engineering applications.
Key words:  hydrogen transmission pipelines    non-metallic sealing materials    nitrile rubber (NBR)    fluoroelastomer (FKM)    polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)    hydrogen compatibility
出版日期:  2026-03-25      发布日期:  2026-04-03
ZTFLH:  TE83  
基金资助: 国家重点研发计划(2022YFB4003400);国家电力投资集团有限公司B1类科研项目(KYB12022QN02)
通讯作者:  *孙晨,硕士,国家电投集团科学技术研究院有限公司资深研究员。目前主要研究领域为管道材料氢损伤及防护专业方向。sunchen@spic.com.cn   
作者简介:  徐猛,硕士,国家电投集团科学技术研究院有限公司研究员。目前主要研究领域为管道材料氢损伤及防护专业方向。
引用本文:    
徐猛, 曲士民, 孙晨, 吕亮亮, 李鑫, 那生巴图, 鲁仰辉. 输氢管道非金属密封材料氢适应性研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25030182-9.
XU Meng, QU Shimin, SUN Chen, LYU Liangliang, LI Xin, NASHENG Batu, LU Yanghui. Study on Hydrogen Compatibility of Non-metallic Sealing Materials for Hydrogen Transmission Pipelines. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(6): 25030182-9.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25030182  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I6/25030182
1 Zhang C, Shao Y, Shen W, et al. ACS Omega, 2023, 8(22), 19212.
2 Yu Q, Hao Y, Ali K, et al. Energy Conversion and Management, 2024, 301, 118025.
3 Huang S, Yang Z L, Li Z Y. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(2), 882(in Chinese).
黄晟, 杨振丽, 李振宇. 化工进展, 2024, 43(2), 882.
4 Liu Z T, Wu Y F, Li Y G, et al. Materials Reports, DOI: 10. 11896/cldb. 24040041 (in Chinese).
刘志坦, 吴溢凡, 李玉刚, 等. 材料导报, DOI: 10. 11896/cldb. 24040041.
5 Zhao Q, Xing Y Y, Wang X Y, et al. Materials Reports , 2024, 38(12), 132(in Chinese).
赵茜, 邢云颖, 王修云, 等. 材料导报, 2024, 38(12), 132.
6 Xu M, Wang T J, Chang X L, et al. Mechanics in Engineering, 2025, 47(1), 131(in Chinese).
徐猛, 王铁军, 常雪伦, 等. 力学与实践, 2025, 47(1), 131.
7 Shang J, Lu Y H, Zheng J Y, et al. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(10), 5499(in Chinese).
尚娟, 鲁仰辉, 郑津洋, 等. 化工进展, 2021, 40(10), 5499.
8 Field R A, Derwent R G. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 58, 46.
9 Melaina M W, Antonia O, Penev M. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, DOI:10. 2172/1219920.
10 Guy P, Laszlo T, Julien C. Processes, 2021, 9 (7), 1219.
11 Birkitt K, Loo-Morrey M, Sanchez C, et al. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(23), 12290.
12 Liu C W, Zhang R, Tian L, et al. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(9), 145(in Chinese).
刘翠伟, 张睿, 田磊, 等. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(9), 145.
13 Zhao Y Z, Zhang X, Zheng J Y, et al. Chemical Engineering & Machinery, 2016(1), 1 (in Chinese).
赵永志, 张鑫, 郑津洋, 等. 化工机械, 2016(1), 1.
14 Liang X B, Fie F, Ma W F, et al. Processes, 2024, 12(11), 2353.
15 Morgan G . JEC Composites Magazine, 2021, 143, 26.
16 Yu Z L, Zhang L Y, Ning C, et al. Mechanics in Engineering, 2022, 44(3), 491(in Chinese).
于子龙, 张立业, 宁晨, 等. 力学与实践, 2022, 44(3), 491.
17 Barth R R, Simmons K L, San Marchi C W. Sandia National Laboratories, DOI:10. 2172/1104755.
18 Flory P J . Principles of polymer chemistry, Cornell University Press, America, 1953, pp. 687.
19 Wu X, Zhang H, Yang M, et al. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(12), 8071.
20 Kulkarni S S, Shin Y, Choi K S, et al. Polymer: the International Journal for the Science and Technology of Polymers, 2023, 282, 13.
21 Yamabe J, Koga A, Nishimura S. Nippon Gomu Kyokaishi, 2010, 83(6), 159.
22 Wilson M A, Frischknecht A L. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(33), 15094.
23 Bouledroua O, Hafsi Z, Djukic M B, et al. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45( 35), 18010.
24 Liu X B, Zhang D, Wu X J, et al. Mechanics in Engineering, 2023, 45(2), 245(in Chinese).
刘啸奔, 张东, 武学健, 等. 力学与实践, 2023, 45(2), 245.
25 Zhu J L, Zhang J, Li Y X, et al. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2024, 43(7), 730(in Chinese).
朱建鲁, 张捷, 李玉星, 等. 油气储运, 2024, 43(7), 730.
26 Zhou C L, Liu X H, Zheng Y R, et al. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2024, 275(15), 111342. 1.
27 Flaconneche B, Martin J, Klopffer M H. Oil & Gas Science and Technology, 2001, 56(3), 261.
28 Menon C, Kruizenga A M, Alvine J, et al. ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Vancouver: ASME, 2016, pp. V06BT06A037.
29 Guo Y, Yang J T, Zhuang J Y, et al. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2019, 589, 117312.
[1] 王艺璇, 唐鸣津, 杨晓萱, 王露露, 薛键鑫, 王帅, 宋晨飞, 陆焕焕, 李杰, 逄显娟. 聚四氟乙烯/聚醚醚酮(PTFE/PEEK)复合材料的制备及摩擦学性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(23): 24120093-10.
[2] 陶俊, 王晓峰, 韩仲熙, 冯博, 南海, 谢中元, 黄亚峰. 铝粉/聚四氟乙烯机械活化含能材料的制备及其微观性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2018, 32(6): 894-898.
[1] SU Ting, SONG Yonghui, ZHANG Shan, TIAN Yuhong, LAN Xinzhe. Influence of Nitric Acid Activation Time on the Structure and Property of Coal-based Electrode Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(4): 528 -532 .
[2] XU Junjie, WAN Long, SONG Dongdong, WANG Junsha, LI Yingying, LIU Yingying. Influence of Cu Content on the Properties of the Al-based Binding Agent and Diamond Tool[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(8): 104 -108 .
[3] WANG Zhongqiang, HU Guosheng, ZHANG Jingting, XU Jiusheng, SHAO Zhengjie. Study on Non-isothermal Crystallization Kinetics of High-temperature
Resistant Polyamides Prepared by Melt Polymerization
[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(6): 161 -170 .
[4] CUI Xinwei, XU Xiaofeng, NING Yuheng, ZHAO Yuguang. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of 7075 Al Alloy Processed by Combined Cold-rolling and T6 Heat-treatment[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(14): 88 -91 .
[5] DU Bin, TONG Zhaoyang, MU Xihui, LIU Zhiwei, WANG Jiang, LIU Shuai, DING Zhijun. Application and Research Progress of Biochemical Sensors Based on Composite Optical Waveguide[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(21): 32 -36 .
[6] WANG Gang, YANG Dingming, LIU Jiang. Preparation and Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells with NiO Films as Hole Transporting Layers[J]. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(10): 6 -10 .
[7] NIE Guanglin, BAO Yiwang, WAN Detian, TIAN Yuan. Methods for Evaluating Mechanical Properties of Cement-based Tubes[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(12): 2072 -2077 .
[8] KANG Yuanyuan, TANG Dengfei, WANG Chuan, DONG Jianfeng. Research Progress of Broadband Circular Polarizers Based on Metamaterials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(11): 1806 -1812 .
[9] ZHANG Xiaofeng, YANG Hao, LI Jiaxing, KAN Zhongwei, SHI Qi, HUANG Zhenyi. The Stacking Fault Energy (SFE) Calculation Model for Fe-Mn-Al-C Low-density Steels Based on Thermodynamics Theory[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(16): 2859 -2864 .
[10] LI Guangda, ZHANG Nan, ZHANG Kaili, ZHAO Santuan, MA Kaiwang, XU Helong, ZHAO Wei, XIE Huixu. Synthesis and Characterization of Magnetic Bioactive Glass Ceramic Thermoseeds Containing Ca Ferrite[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(24): 4211 -4216 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed