INORGANIC MATERIALS AND CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Mechanical Properties and Stress-Strain Relationship of Soda Residue Calcium Carbide Slag Activated Concrete |
GUO Weichao1,2, ZHAO Qingxin1,2,*, QIU Yongxiang2,3, SHI Yuxuan2,3, WANG Shuai2,3
|
1 State Key Laboratory of Metastable Materials Science and Technology, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, Hebei, China 2 Hebei Province Engineering Research Center for Harmless Synergistic Treatment and Recycling of Municipal Solid Waste, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, Hebei, China 3 Key Laboratory of Green Construction and Intelligent Maintenance for Civil Engineering of Hebei Province, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, Hebei, China |
|
|
Abstract The large-scale stacking of alkaline industrial solid wastes such as soda residue (SR) and calcium carbide slag (CS) has caused serious environmental pollution problems, which is urgent to expand the channels of resource utilization. A new type of concrete (SCB-based concrete, SCBC) was prepared by using the previously developed SR-CS synergistically activated blast furnace slag-fly ash binder (SCB) instead of cement. Its basic mechanical properties such as compression, tensile and flexural properties, and uniaxial compressive constitutive relationship were studied. The results showed that the early compressive strength of SCBC was slower than that of Portland cement concrete (PCC), which could be improved by appropriate heat curing (60—75 ℃@12 h), and would not have an adverse impact on the later strength. The tension-compression ratio and flexural-compression ratio were 0.102±0.006 and 0.137±0.007, respectively, which were higher than that of PCC with the same grade. SCBC had a shorter elastic rising segment and longer plastic rising segment than PCC under uniaxial compression, and exhibited stronger brittleness after peak stress. The prediction models of standard compressive, axial compressive, split tensile, and flexural strength, as well as the uniaxial compressive stress-strain relationship, were established through statistical regression, which were in good agreement with the experimental values, and laid a theoretical foundation for the mix proportion design, strength prediction and engineering application of SCBC.
|
Published: 10 September 2024
Online: 2024-09-30
|
|
Fund:Hebei Natural Science Foundation (E2023203172), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078450), and the Key Research and Development Project of Hebei Province (19211505D). |
|
|
1 Provis J L, Palomo A, Shi C. Cement and Concrete Research, 2015, 78, 110. 2 Wang Y B, Yuan Y, Zhao R D, et al. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(15), 15102 (in Chinese). 王永宝, 原元, 赵人达, 等. 材料导报, 2020, 34(15), 15102. 3 Zhang P, Wang K, Li Q, et al. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 258, 120896. 4 Ding Y, Dai J, Shi C. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 127, 68. 5 Wan X M, Zhang Y, Zhao T J, et al. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(12), 2091 (in Chinese). 万小梅, 张宇, 赵铁军, 等. 材料导报, 2018, 32(12), 2091. 6 Tong G Q, Zhang W Y, Gao Y T, et al. Materials Reports, 2022, 36(4), 129 (in Chinese). 童国庆, 张吾渝, 高义婷, 等. 材料导报, 2022, 36(4), 129. 7 Zhao X, Liu C, Zuo L, et al. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 260, 121045. 8 Meng J, Zhong L, Wang L, et al. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25, 8827. 9 Liu J, Zhao Q, Zhang J, et al. Journal of Building Materials, 2019, 22(6), 872 (in Chinese). 刘继中, 赵庆新, 张津瑞, 等. 建筑材料学报, 2019, 22(6), 872. 10 Lin Y H, Xu D Q, Zhao X H. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2019, 38(9), 2876 (in Chinese). 林永会, 徐东强, 赵献辉. 硅酸盐通报, 2019, 38(9), 2876. 11 Li W, Yi Y. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 238, 117713. 12 Zhang J, Tan H, He X, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 249, 118763. 13 Zhao X, Liu C, Wang L, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2019, 98, 125. 14 Hanjitsuwan S, Phoo-ngernkham T, Li L Y, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 162, 714. 15 Guo W, Zhang Z, Bai Y, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 291, 123367. 16 Guo W, Wang S, Xu Z, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 302, 124403. 17 Sofi M, Deventer J, Mendis P A, et al. Cement and Concrete Research, 2007, 37, 251. 18 Ibrahim M, Johari M, Rahman M K, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 189, 352. 19 Diaz-loya E I, Allouche E N, Vaidya S. ACI Materials Journal, 2011, 108, 300. 20 Dhevaraju L, Reddy E A, Dogiparthy N D, et al. In:the 3rd National Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction Management (SECON), Angamaly, 2019, pp.139. 21 Pan Z, Sanjayan J G, Rangan B V. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2011, 63, 763. 22 Guo Z H. Strength and constitutive relationship of concrete-principle and application, China Architecture & Building Press, China, 2004, pp.35 (in Chinese). 过镇海. 混凝土的强度和本构关系-原理与应用, 中国建筑工业出版社, 2004, pp.35. |
|
|
|