INORGANIC MATERIALS AND CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES |
|
|
|
|
|
Synthesis and Photocatalytic Properties of CuS/CQDs/g-C3N4 |
YU Qiaoling1,2, LIU Chengbao1,2,3,*, JIN Tao1,2, CHEN Feng1,2,3, QIAN Junchao1,2,3, QIU Yongbin4, MENG Xianrong5, CHEN Zhigang1,2,3
|
1 Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Environment Functional Materials, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, Jiangsu, China 2 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, Jiangsu, China 3 Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Technology and Material for Water Treatment, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, Jiangsu, China 4 Jiangsu Province Ceramics Research Institute Co., Ltd., Yixing 214221, Jiangsu, China 5 Suzhou Institute of Environmental Science, Suzhou 215007, Jiangsu, China |
|
|
Abstract CQDs (Carbon quantum dots) were obtained by hydrothermal method with lemon juice as the carbon source. CuS/CQDs/g-C3N4 was synthesized using copper trihydrate nitrate (Cu(NO3)2·3H2O), thiourea(CH4N2S) and lemon juice as starting materials via ultrasonic shock method. CuS/CQDs/g-C3N4 three-phase composite photocatalyst with p-n-type heterojunction structure was obtained successfully. The structure and morphology of the material were analyzed by various methods, such as XRD, SEM, TEM, XPS, PL, BET and UV-Vis. The results showed that the interface structure is well constructed with high purity and uniform distribution. In the photocatalytic degradation experiment, the best photocatalytic degradation of the CuS/CQDs/g-C3N4 composite was achieved at approximately 72.1% when the CuS content was 10wt%. After the RhB degradation in 4 cycles, the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of the composite material was not significantly reduced, and it still remained at 65.2%. Finally, it is clear that ·O2-radical is the main factor in photocatalytic degradation, and h+ radical is the second factor.
|
Published:
Online: 2024-06-25
|
|
Fund:Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20180103,BK20180971), Suzhou Science and Technology Deve-lopment Plan Project (SS202036). |
|
|
1 Sun Z X, Wang H Q, Wu Z B, et al. Catalysis Today, 2018, 300, 160. 2 Lee H, Park I S, Bang H J, et al. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 471, 893. 3 Lee D E, Devthade V, Moru S, et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2022, 902, 163612. 4 Tang F, Liu C B, Chen F, et al. Ceramics International, 2022, 48, 28614, . 5 Shang Y Y, Chen X, Liu W W, et al. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2017, 204, 78. 6 Fang Y X, Wang X C. Chemical Communications, 2018, 54 (45), 5674. 7 Savateev A, Ghosh I, König B, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57 (49), 15936. 8 Jin T, Liu C B, Chen F, et al. Carbon Letters, 2022, 32(6), 1451. 9 Zhang Z F, Tang L, Sun L, et al. Fine Chemical Industry, 2019, 36(2), 237. 10 Cheng F Y, Yin H, Xiang Q J, et al. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 391, 432. 11 Zhu D H, Nai X Y, Lan S J, et al. Applied Surface Science, 2016, 390, 25. 12 Wang F, Zeng Q R, Tang J P, et al. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2020, 20, 5896. 13 Cai Z L, Zhou Y M, Ma S S, et al. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 2017, 348, 168. 14 Yu J, Zhang J, Liu S. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2010, 114(32), 13642. 15 He K L, Xie J, Luo X Y, et al. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2017, 38, 240. 16 He K, Xie J, Liu Z Q, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018, 6, 13110. 17 Cheng F Y, Yin H, Xiang Q J, et al. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 391, 432. 18 Zhang Z Y, Huang J D, Zhang M Y, et al. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2015, 163, 298. 19 Zou J, Wu S L, Liu Y, et al. Carbon, 2018, 130, 652. 20 Zou J, Deng W M, Jiang J Z, et al. Electrochimica Acta, 2020, 354, 136658. 21 Zou J, Mao D P, Li N, et al. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 506, 144672. 22 Xu J, Wang Y, Zhu Y. Catalysis Communications, 2013, 29(33), 10566. 23 Xu G, Xu Y, Zhou Z, et al. Diamond and Related Materials, 2019, 97, 107461. 24 Duan J H, Song X K, Zhao H, et al. Optical Materials, 2020, 101, 109761. |
|
|
|