比较不同压头提取离子辐照后低活化铁素体/马氏体钢屈服强度的差异

doi:10.11896/cldb.22010165

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (3695KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The yield strength of low-activation ferritic/martensitic steel irradiated at 550 ℃ with different doses was extracted by Berkovich and Spherical indenter for comparison with each other. The results show that an obvious irradiation induced hardening behavior was observed, while the hardness first increased and then decreased with the increasing of irradiation dose. Regarding the unirradiated samples, the difference of yield strength extracted by these two indenters was smaller, but they were both higher than the yield strength obtained from the tensile experiments. For irradiated samples, the yield strength extracted by spherical indenter was significantly higher than that by Berkovich indenter. The maximum difference in yield strength (Δσ_y) between them was 43%. Comparing the irradiation effect on the yield strength extracted using both Berkovich and spherical indenters, it can be found that the values obtained from the spherical indenter were closer to these obtained from the neutron irradiated sample in comparison to the Berkovich indenter. The reasons caused this significant gap in Δσ_y were attributed to the effect of the indenter shape, penetration depth, and the height of pile-up.

Key words： low activation martensitic steel ion irradiation hardness yield strength indenter

Published: 25 September 2023 Online: 2023-09-18

CLC number:

TG142.1

Fund:National Natural Science Foundation of China (12105044), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi (20202BABL211014), and Department of Education of Foundation of Jiangxi (GJJ180401).

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHAN Zixiong
	HUANG Xi
	WEI Lihua
	YANG Xiya
	LI Qingshan
	LI Xiaoyan

Cite this article:

ZHAN Zixiong,HUANG Xi,WEI Lihua, et al. Comparison of the Yield Strength of Ion Irradiated Low Activation Ferritic/Martensitic Steel Extracted from Different Indenters[J]. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(18): 22010165-6.

URL:

http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.22010165 OR http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2023/V37/I18/22010165

1 Li X G, Yan Q Z, Ge C C. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, 2009, 21(6), 6 (in Chinese).
黎兴刚, 燕青芝, 葛昌纯. 钢铁研究学报, 2009, 21(6), 6.
2 Bloom E E, Conn R W, Davis J W, et al. Journal Nuclear Materials, 1984, 122(1-3), 17.
3 Tanigawa H, Gaganidze E, Hirose T, et al. Nuclear Fusion, 2017, 57(9), 092004.
4 Baluc N, Gelles D S, Jitsukawa S, et al. Journal Nuclear Materials, 2007, 367, 33.
5 Schuh C A. Materials Today, 2006, 9(5), 32.
6 Was G S, Jias Z, Getto E, et al. Scripta Materialia, 2014, 88, 33.
7 Krumwiede D L, Yamamoto T, Saleh T A. Journal Nuclear Materials, 2018, 504, 135.
8 Pathak S, Kalidindi S R. Materials Science and Engineering Reports, 2015, 91, 1.
9 Voyiadjis G Z, Zhang C. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2015, 621, 218.
10 Zhang C, Voyiadjis G Z. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2016, 659, 55.
11 Heintze C, Recknagel C, Bergner F, et al. Nuclear Instruments and Met-hods in Physics Research Section B-Beam Interactions with Materials Atoms, 2009, 267(8), 1505.
12 Ruiz-Moreno A, Hahner P. Materials & Design, 2018, 145, 168.
13 Elmustafa A A, Stone D S. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of So-lids, 2003, 51(2), 357.
14 Lilleodden E T, Zimmerman J A, Foiles S M, et al. Journal of the Mechanics Physics of Solids, 2003, 51(5), 901.
15 Zhu T. Journal of Mechanics Physics of Solids, 2004, 52(3), 691.
16 Mattucci M A, Cherubin I, Changizian P, et al. Acta Materialia, 2021, 207, 116702.
17 Hosemann P, Kiener D, Wang Y, et al. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2012, 425(1), 136.
18 Liu J Z, Huang H F, Zhu Z B, et al. Acta Metall Sinica, 2020, 56(5), 753 (in Chinese).
刘继召, 黄鹤飞, 朱振博, 等. 金属学报, 2020, 56(5), 753.
19 Zinkle S J. Comprehensive Nuclear Materials, 2012, 1, 65.
20 Li Q S, Shen Y Z, Huang X, et al. Metals and Materials International, 2017, 23(6), 1106.
21 Nix W D, Gao H J. Journal of Mechanics Physics of Solids, 1998, 46(3), 411.
22 Feng G, Nix W D. Scripta Materialia, 2004, 51(6), 599.
23 Kareer A, Prasitthipayong A, Krumwiede D. Journal of Nuclear Mate-rials, 2018, 498, 274.
24 Milot T S. Establishing correlations for predicting tensile properties based on the shear punch test and vickers microhardness data. Master's Thesis, University of California Santa Barbara, USA, 2013.
25 Zhu P C, Zhao Y J, Agarwal S, et al. Materials & Design, 2022, 213, 110317.
26 Ge H, Peng L, Dai Y, et al. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2016, 468, 240.
27 Briscoe B J, Sebastian K S, Adams M J. Journal of Mechanics Physics of Solids, 1994. 27(6), 1156.
28 Miyake K, Fujisawa S, Korenaga A, et al. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 2004, 43(7), 4602.
29 Gaganidze E, Schneider H C, Petersen C, et al. In: Conference Record of the 21st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference. Chengdu, 2008, pp. 13.
30 Monteiro De Sena Silvares de Carvalho I. Steels for nuclear reactors: Eurofer 97. Master's Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, 2016.
31 Wakai E, Taguchi T, Yamamoto T, et al. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2004, 329, 1133.
32 Tong Z, Dai Y. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2010, 398(1), 43.
33 Kasada R, Kimura A. Materials Transactions, 2005, 46(3), 475.