METALS AND METAL MATRIX COMPOSITES |
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis of Stress and Strain Inhomogeneity During the Tensile Deformation of Ferrite/Martensitic Dual Phase Steel |
MA Cainv1, GAO Xueyun1,2, XING Lei1, WANG Haiyan1,2, HU Zhiyu1, ZHAI Tingting1
|
1 School of Materials and Metallurgy, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, Inner Monglia, China 2 Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Key Laboratory of Advanced Metal Materials, Baotou 014010, Inner Monglia, China |
|
|
Abstract In the present work, the ferrite / martensite dual-phase steel was taken as the research object. After rolling and heat treatment, the tensile test with a deformation of 5% was performed. The field emission scanning electron microscope equipped with EBSD imaging system was utilized to analyze the micro-area orientation of the experimental steel after plastic deformation, and the plastic deformation behavior was simulated by combining the crystal plasticity simulation DAMASK software. The results showed that the two corresponding stress-strain distribution of ferrite / martensite dual-phase steel obtained by rolling deformation was uneven. The martensite accumulated more dislocations in the experimental steel, and the KAM value was larger. The Schmid factor of ferrite matrix near the martensite region was larger than 0.49, and dislocations and slips were prone to occur preferentially during elastic deformation. The consequences of crystal plasticity simulation showed that at the beginning of deformation, ferrite needed to bear large strain and martensite needed to bear stress to coordinate the overall deformation. When the tensile deformation continues to occur, the inhomogeneity of the two analogous force-strain distribution will lead to the first fracture at the two-phase boundary and at the grain boundary.
|
Published: 10 June 2023
Online: 2023-06-19
|
|
Fund:National Natural Science Foundation of China(51764047), the Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology Innovation Fund(2019QDL-B15). |
|
|
1 Kimura Y, Inoue T, Yin F, et al. Science, 2008, 320(5879), 1057. 2 Tasan C C, Diehl M, Yan D, et al. Acta Materialia, 2014,81,386. 3 Azuma M, Goutianos S, Hansen N, et al. Materials Science and Techno-logy, 2013, 28(9-10),1092. 4 Wang W, Li M, He C, et al. Materials & Design, 2013,47, 510. 5 Tasan C C, Diehl M, Yan D, et al. Annual Review of Materials Research, 2015, 45(1), 391. 6 Roters F, Diehl M, Shanthraj P, et al. Computational Materials Science, 2019,158,420. 7 Zhang H, Liu J, Sui D, et al. International Journal of Plasticity, 2018(100), 69. 8 Gao X, Wang H, Xing L, et al. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2021,805, 140547. 9 Groeber M A, Jackson M A. Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation, 2014, 3(1), 56. 10 Cui G B, Ju X H, Wang Z Y, et al. China Metallurgy, 2019, 29(9), 39(in Chinese). 崔桂彬, 鞠新华, 王泽阳, 等. 中国冶金, 2019, 29(9), 39. 11 Alharbi K, Ghadbeigi H, Efthymiadis P, et al. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2015, 23(8), 85005. 12 Zhang D X, Li Y, Ye Y X, et al. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2016, 52(3), 369(in Chinese). 张笃秀, 李祎, 叶友雄, 等. 金属学报, 2016, 52(3), 369. 13 Marvi-Mashhadi M, Mazinani M, Rezaee-Bazzaz A. Computational Materials Science, 2012,65, 197. 14 De Knijf D, F?jer C, Kestens L a I, et al. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2015,638, 219. 15 Zhang X, Zhang S, Zhao Q, et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2018,740, 660. 16 Martin G, Sinclair C W, Lebensohn R A. Materials Science and Enginee-ring: A, 2014,603, 37. 17 Taylor M D, Matlock D K, De Moor E, et al. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2014, 23(10), 3685. 18 Woo W, Em V T, Kim E Y, et al. Acta Materialia, 2012, 60(20), 6972. 19 Wu Z Q, Ding H, Li H Y, et al. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2013,584, 150. 20 Park K, Nishiyama M, Nakada N, et al. Materials Science and Enginee-ring: A, 2014,604,135. |
|
|
|