| INORGANIC MATERIALS AND CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES |
|
|
|
|
|
| A Technological Review on Controllable Preparation of Hollow StructuredNano-TiO2 Microspheres |
| LYU Bin1,2, CHENG Kun1,2, GAO Dangge1,2, MA Jianzhong1,2
|
1 College of Bioresources Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi’an 710021;
2 National Demonstration Center for Experimental Light Chemistry Engineering Education (Shaanxi University of Science & Technology), Xi’an 710021 |
|
|
|
Abstract As a multifunctional material with strong redox ability, stable chemical properties, wide source and environmental friendliness, nano-TiO2 is considered as one of the most promising semiconductor photocatalytic materials. Among various morphologies of nano-TiO2, hollow-structured TiO2 microspheres have aroused increasing interests owing to their low density, large specific surface area, favorable permeability and high stability.
Undoubtedly, it is of great significance to seek an ideal approach with simple process, favorable repeatability and controllable morphology for hollow nano-TiO2 microsphere preparation. According to the preparation principle, preparation methods of hollow nano-TiO2 microspheres can be divided into sol-gel method, hydrothermal method, solvothermal method, spray drying method and layer self-assembly method. According to whether the template is added in the preparation process, these methods can also be classified into hard template method, soft template method and template-free method.
In this article, preparation approaches of hollow nano-TiO2 microspheres with and without template are reviewed. Among them, the hard template is regarded as the earliest method applied for the preparation of hollow TiO2 microspheres. Concerning the hard template method, the morphology, cavity size and surface charge of the obtained hollow nano-TiO2 are closely related to the types of adopting templates. Currently, there are mainly three kinds of hard template agents commonly used by researchers, including polymers, carbon spheres and inorganic oxides. Howe-ver, it is time consuming and a waste of organic solvent to prepare template agent, which resulted in an increase in production cost and environmental pollution. The soft template method is considered as one of the most efficient approach to prepare hollow nano-TiO2, which shares similar preparation principle with hard template method. The major distinction between hard template method and soft template method lies in the selection of template agents. Specifically speaking, the former usually employ rigid inorganic particles as template agents, and the latter commonly adopt low-intensity gas or liquid like emulsion droplets, supramolecular micelles, polymer aggregates or vesicles as template agents. Particularly, soft template method is superior to hard template method because of its convenience for removing the template agent in the later stage (no high temperature treatment is required). Therefore, soft template method features high efficiency and simple process. The template-free method is one of the most promising preparation methods for hollow nano-TiO2 microspheres. Unfortunately, the one-step reaction of template-free method leads to poor controllability for its products, which blocks the practical application, not to mention mass production. Nevertheless, thanks to the simple preparation steps, low cost and high yield of template-free method, it still exhibits great potential in batch production and large-scale preparation of hollow TiO2 microspheres.
At present, in addition to the effective and mature preparation process, numerous efforts have been made by researchers in pursuit of high-efficiency photocatalytic performance of hollow nano-TiO2 microspheres. It is believed that the photocatalytic properties of hollow nano-TiO2 can be further improved through the following three attempts. Firstly, the combination of a plurality of semiconductor materials will contribute to improving the response area under visible light. Secondly, non-metal anions (nitrogen, carbon) or metal (iron, copper) ion doping is beneficial to the separation efficiency of photoinduced titanium dioxide electron-hole pairs. Thirdly, surface modification of metal oxide and in-situ polymerization modification are conducive to reduce the recombination of electron-hole pairs. It is worth pointing out that prolonging the lifetime of photogenerated car-riers and increasing photocatalytic activity will become the research focus of hollow TiO2 microspheres in the future.
|
|
Published: 12 March 2019
|
|
|
|
|
1 Zhang Z, Zuo F, Feng P. Journal of Materials Chemistry,2010,20(11),2206.
2 Zhang R Y, Tu B, Zhao D Y. Chemistry-A European Journal,2010,16(33),9977.
3 Diaz-Real J A, Dubed-Bandomo G C, Galindo-de-la-Rosa J, et al. Applied Catalysis B Environmental,2018,222,18.
4 Seadira T W P, Sadanandam G, Ntho T, et al. Applied Catalysis B Environmental,2017,222,133.
5 Dong W, Yao Y, Li L, et al. Applied Catalysis B Environmental,2017,217,293.
6 Nguyen C C, Vu N N, Do T O. Journal of Materials Chemistry A,2015,3(36),18345.
7 Valtchev V, Tosheva L. Chemical Reviews,2013,113(8),6734.
8 Fujishima A, Honda K. Nature,1972,238(5358),37.
9 Fujishima A, Rao T N, Tryk D A. Journal of Photochemistry & Photobio-logy C Photochemistry Reviews,2000,1(1),1.
10 Chen R, Wang J, Wang H, et al. Solid State Sciences,2011,13(3),630.
11 Wanag A, Rokicka P, Kusiaknejman E, et al. Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety,2018,147,788.
12 Ma Q, Wang H, Zhang H, et al. Separation & Purification Technology,2017,189,193.
13 Zhang W, Xi Z, Li G, et al. Small,2009,5(15),1742.
14 Yu X, Yu J, Cheng B, et al. Journal of Physical Chemistry C,2009,113(40),17527.
15 Cong H, Yu S. Advanced Functional Materials,2010,17(11),1814.
16 Fang X, Zhao X, Fang W, et al. Nanoscale,2013,5(6),2205.
17 Liu B, Zeng H. Small,2005,1(5),566.
18 Ao Y H, Xu J J, Fu D G, et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2009,167(1-3),413.
19 Cui Y, Liu L, Li B, et al. Journal of Physical Chemistry C,2010,114(6),2434.
20 Lv Y J, Shi K Y, Guo X Z, et al. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities,2006,27(2),346(in Chinese).
吕幼军,石可瑜,郭先芝,等.高等学校化学学报,2006,27(2),346.
21 Song X Q, Yang X H, Chen R F, et al. Acta Chimica Sinica,2006,64(3),198(in Chinese).
宋秀芹,杨晓辉,陈汝芬,等.化学学报,2006,64(3),198.
22 Iida M, Sasaki T, Watanabe M. Chemistry of Materials,1998,10(12),3780.
23 Xiong X, Yu Z, Lin M, et al. Reactive & Functional Polymers,2012,72(6),365.
24 Bao Y, Yang Y Q, Jianzhong M A. Journal of Inorganic Materials,2013,28(5),459.
25 Caruso F, Shi X Y, Caruso R A, et al. Advanced Materials,2001,13,740.
26 Petkovich N D, Stein A. Chemical Society Reviews,2013,42(9),3721.
27 Lu Y, Mclellan J, Xia Y. Langmuir,2004,20(8),3464.
28 Zhuang Y, Sun J, Guan M. Journal of Alloys & Compounds,2016,662,84.
29 Zhang K, Zhang X, Chen H, et al. Langmuir,2004,20(26),11312.
30 Song X S, Gao L. Journal of Physical Chemistry C,2007,111(23),8180.
31 Bao Y, Kang Q L. Journal of Inorganic Materials,2017,32(6),581(in Chinese).
鲍艳,康巧玲.无机材料学报,2017,32(6),581.
32 Xiong X, Lin M, Duan J, et al. Reactive & Functional Polymers,2012,72(6),365.
33 Perlich J, Memesa M, Diethert A, et al. Physica Status Solidi-Rapid Research Letters,2009,3(4),118.
34 Kim T H, Lee K H, Kwon Y K. Journal of Colloid & Interface Science,2006,304(2),370.
35 Strohm H, Löbmann P. Journal of Materials Chemistry,2004,14(2),138.
36 Strohm H. Journal of Materials Chemistry,2004,14(17),2667.
37 Imhof A. Langmuir,2001,17(12),3579.
38 Kang Q L, Bao Y, Li M, et al. Progress in Organic Coatings,2017,112,153.
39 Wang D, Song C, Lin Y, et al. Materials Letters,2006,60(1),77.
40 Li H, Ha C S, Kim I. Langmuir,2008,24(19),10552.
41 Sun X, Liu J, Li Y. Chemistry-A European Journal,2006,12(7),2039.
42 Ren W, Ai Z, Jia F, et al. Applied Catalysis B Environmental,2007,69(3),138.
43 Réti B, Kiss G I, Gyulavári T, et al. Catalysis Today,2016,284,160.
44 Wang C, Ao Y, Wang P, et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2010,178(1),517.
45 Zhao D, Peng T, Xiao J, et al. Materials Letters,2007,61(1),105.
46 Parida K M, Sahu N. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A Chemical,2008,287(1),151.
47 Zhao D, Peng T, Liu M, et al. Microporous & Mesoporous Materials,2008,114(1),166.
48 Peng T, Zhao D, Song H, et al. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A Chemical,2005,238(1),119.
49 Ao Y H, Xu J J, Fu D G, et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2009,167(1),413.
50 Liu J, Qin W, Zuo S, et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2009,163(1),273.
51 Wong M S, Hsu S W, Rao K K, et al. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A Chemical,2008,279(1),20.
52 Wang S H, Chen T K, Rao K K, et al. Applied Catalysis B Environmental,2007,76(3),328.
53 Wang C, Ao Y, Wang P, et al. Powder Technology,2011,210(3),203.
54 Wang C, Ao Y, Wang P, et al. Applied Surface Science,2010,257(1),227.
55 Yu J, Wang G. Journal of Physics & Chemistry of Solids,2008,69(5),1147.
56 Li G, Liu F, Zhang Z. Journal of Alloys & Compounds,2010,493(1-2),L1.
57 Ji B J, Qiao Z, Lee I, et al. Advanced Functional Materials,2012,22(1),166.
58 Bala H, Yu Y, Zhang Y. Materials Letters,2008,62(14),2070.
59 Wang Y, Zhou A, Yang Z. Materials Letters,2008,62(12-13),1930.
60 Nakashima T, Kimizuka N. Journal of the American Chemical Society,2003,125(21),6386.
61 Nagamine S, Sugioka A, Iwamoto H, et al. Powder Technology,2008,186(2),168.
62 Li B, Wang J H, Guo Y Z, et al. Materials Review,2006,20(7),36(in Chinese).
李斌,王剑华,郭玉忠,等.材料导报,2006,20(7),36.
63 Castillo S I R, Krans N A, Pompe C E, et al. Colloids & Surfaces A Physicochemical & Engineering Aspects,2016,504,228.
64 Lu L Y, Xu L, Yin T T, et al. Advanced Materials Research,2013,634-638(1),2189.
65 Bao Y, Guo J, Ma J, et al. Journal of Industrial & Engineering Chemistry,2017,53,51.
66 Deng F P, Li Y, Qi X H, et al. Journal of Inorganic Materials,2009,24(1),39(in Chinese).
邓凤萍,李岳,岂兴红,等.无机材料学报,2009,24(1),39.
67 Kresge C T, Leonowicz M E, Roth W J, et al. Nature,1992,359(6397),710.
68 Li X, Xiong Y, Li Z, et al. Inorganic Chemistry,2006,45(9),3493.
69 Tian Q, Song J, Zhang Z, et al. Materials Chemistry & Physics,2015,151(154),66.
70 Wang L, Bao J, Wang L, et al. Chemistry-A European Journal,2006,12(24),6341.
71 Wei W, Xiao X, Zhang S, et al. Nanoscale Research Letters,2009,4(8),926.
72 Zhu G N, Wang Y G, Xia Y Y. Energy & Environmental Science,2012,5(5),6652.
73 Etacheri V, Marom R, Ran E, et al. Energy & Environmental Science,2011,4(9),3243.
74 Yang H G, Zeng H C. Journal of Physical Chemistry B,2004,108(11),3492.
75 Bao Y, Kang Q L, Ma J Z. Colloids & Surfaces A Physicochemical & Engineering Aspects,2018,537,69.
76 Wang Q, Qin Z, Chen J, et al. Applied Surface Science,2016,364(427),1.
77 Bao Y, Kang Q L, Ma J Z, et al. Ceramics International,2017,43,8596.
78 Nguyen D T, Kim K S. Chemical Engineering Journal,2016,286,266.
79 Li J, Zeng H C. Journal of the American Chemical Society,2007,129(51),15839.
80 Bordes M C, Vicent M, Moreno A, et al. Surface & Coatings Technology,2013,220(15),179.
81 Lakhotiya H, Singh R, Bahadur J, et al. Journal of Alloys & Compounds,2014,584(1),101.
82 Fang X, Zhao X, Fang W, et al. Nanoscale,2013,5(6),2205. |
|
|
|
渝公网安备50019002502923号 © Editorial Office of Materials Reports.
2019, Vol. 33 
