基于田口灰色关联法对Fe06-15%TiC熔覆层激光工艺参数的优化

doi:10.11896/cldb.21080157

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (18568KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract As a new type of surface modification technology, laser cladding technology has been widely used in various fields. The morphology of the cladding layer is directly related to the quality and laser process parameters. In this paper, the Taguchi method was used to design an orthogonal experiment with 25 groups of three factors and five levels for obtain apt process parameters. Taking laser power, scanning speed and powder feeding rate as input parameters, with width of cladding layer, height of cladding layer and dilution rate as output parameters (response target), contour graphs and surface graphs were used to intuitively reflect the relationship between input parameters and output parameters; signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and analysis of variance (ANVOA) were used to further analyze the relationship between input and output parameters. Then combined with the gray theory, the three response targets were transformed into a single gray correlation grade (GRG) for analysis, and the optimal combination of laser process parameters was obtained as follows: laser power 1 000 W, scanning speed 3 mm/s, powder feeding rate 1.4 r/min. Finally, the three response targets were found to be uniformly improved on verification tests. The cladding layer formed with this parameter has more significant advantages in terms of morphology and microstructure than that formed under other parameters, and the reliability of Taguchi grey correlation method is verified.

Key words： process parameter Taguchi method analysis of variance signal to noise ratio grey relational grade microstructure

Published: Online: 2023-01-03

CLC number:

TN249

Fund:Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2020520002), and Major Science and Technology Special Project of Karamay City, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2018ZD002B)

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YANG Kaixin
	SUN Wenlei
	XIAO Qi
	XING Xuefeng
	CHEN Zihao

Cite this article:

YANG Kaixin,SUN Wenlei,XIAO Qi, et al. Optimization of Laser Process Parameters of Fe06-15%TiC Cladding Layer Based on Taguchi Grey Correlation Method[J]. Materials Reports, 2022, 36(24): 21080157-9.

URL:

http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.21080157 OR http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2022/V36/I24/21080157

1 Chen X M, Wang H J, Zhou X L, et al. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(Z1), 341(in Chinese).
陈小明, 王海金, 周夏凉, 等. 材料导报, 2018, 32(Z1), 341.
2 Tan J H, Sun R L, Niu W, et al. Materials Reports A: Review Papers, 2020, 34(8), 15132(in Chinese).
谭金花, 孙荣禄, 牛伟, 等. 材料导报:综述篇, 2020, 34(8), 15132.
3 Zhang J C, Shi S H, Gong Y Q, et al. Surface Technology, 2020, 49(10), 1(in Chinese).
张津超, 石世宏, 龚燕琪, 等. 表面技术, 2020, 49(10), 1.
4 Yu T B, Song B X, Xi W C, et al. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 2019, 40(4), 537(in Chinese).
于天彪, 宋博学, 郗文超, 等. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 40(4), 537.
5 Zhao D D, Jiao F. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(10), 2073(in Chinese).
赵丹丹, 焦锋. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(10), 2073.
6 Du Y B, Zhou Z J, Xu L, et al. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2021, 21(6), 3 (in Chinese).
杜彦斌, 周志杰, 许磊, 等. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 21(6), 3.
7 Ren X, Liu H L, Lu F Y, et al. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 2021, 96(9), 105490.
8 Sampree K R, Vasareddy M, Rajesh K, et al. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020, 21(Pt 1), 244.
9 Vasareddy M, Sampreet K R, Rajesh K. et al. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020, 21(Pt 1), 595.
10 Dinh S N, Hong S P, Chang M L. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2020, 55, 230.
11 Asit B, Pratoh S S, Saroj K P. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020, 26(Pt 2), 2323.
12 Liu Y, Liu C, Liu W S, et al. Optics and Laser Technology, 2019, 111, 470.
13 Timur C, Muzaffer Z, Tamer S. Optics and Laser Technology, 2019, 120, 105714.
14 Levent S, Mustafa I, et al. Procedia CIRP, 2020, 94, 505.
15 Sasavanan M, Bupesh R V K, Palanikumar K, et al. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 313, 652.
16 Long J Q, Huang W H, Xiang J W, et al. Optics and Laser Technology, 2018, 108, 97.
17 Pang Y F, Fu G Y, Wang M Y, et al. Chinese Journal of Laser, 2021, 48(6), 152 (in Chinese).
庞祎帆, 傅戈雁, 王明雨, 等. 中国激光, 2021, 48(6), 152.
18 Ye F X, Yang Y, Lou Z, et al. Materials Letters, 2021, 284(P1), 128859.
19 Chen T, Deng Z X, Liu D F, et al. Surface & Coatings Technology, 2021, 423, 127635.
20 Dara M, Goodarzi J, Pekkarinen A S. Welding in the World, 2017, 61(5), 883.
21 Kaushal A, Alexander R, Rao P T, et al. Carbon Trends, 2021, 2, 100016.
22 Wang M D, Zuo D W, Wang M, et al. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics ＆ Astronautics, 2009, 41(3), 354(in Chinese).
王明娣, 左敦稳, 王珉, 等. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2009, 41(3), 354.
23 Zhang Q M, Zhong M L, Yang L, et al. Transactions of the China Wel-ding Institution, 2001(4), 51(in Chinese).
张庆茂, 钟敏霖, 杨森, 等. 焊接学报, 2001(4), 51.
24 Zhang Q M, Liu W J, Yang S, et al. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, 2002, 14(1), 11(in Chinese).
张庆茂, 刘文今, 杨森, 等. 钢铁研究学报, 2002, 14(1), 11.
25 Sudhin C, Rajesh R, Dev A M. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 213, 590.
26 Kadhim A H. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020, 20(Pt 4), 466.
27 Zhang Z, Kovacevic R. The Journal of the Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 2016, 68(7), 1762.
28 Tamrin K F, Nukman Y, Sheikh N A, et al. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2014, 57, 40.
29 Kaja S S T. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 226, 618.
30 Subrata M, Paul C P, Kukreja L M, et al. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2013, 66(1-4), 91.