金属氧化物电催化析氧机理的研究进展

doi:10.11896/cldb.21030163

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (17665KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Water splitting is essential for the conversion and storage of renewable energy such as wind, tidal, and solar energy. Oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is the bottleneck of water splitting, due to the sluggish four-electron transfer process. An efficient and durable electrocatalyst is required to improve the overall efficiency of electrolysis. Metal oxides have been widely investigated in the past few decades, and are considered as the most promising OER electrocatalyst, given the low cost and moderate performance.
The rational design of efficient catalysts firstly calls for a better understanding of the OER mechanism. Much efforthas been devoted to providing insights to elucidate the detailed mechanism. The traditional adsorption-desorption model was learned from heterogeneous catalysis and worked to search for descriptors, which guides the fast screen of advanced electrocatalysts. More recently, the traditional mechanism has been progressively challenged. The high activity and kinetics of some new electrocatalysts can not be fully explained or even contradict the traditional mechanism, which in turn preclude the exploration of novel electrocatalysts.
Thanks to the development of advanced characterization techniques and theoretical calculation methods in recent years, the understanding of the OER mechanism has been pushed forwards well. New catalytic mechanisms have been proposed and validated, which sheds light on the rational design of advanced electrocatalysts. These new mechanisms include: lattice oxygen evolution mechanism (LOM), dual-sites mechanism with O-O bond coupling, proton acceptor mechanism. In addition, the mechanism of cation dissolution has also been elucidated in some cases to explain the stability of the catalysts.
In this review, we start with the introduction of metal oxides and the traditional OER mechanisms. Following this, we systematically summarize the newly proposed mechanisms of lattice oxygen evolution mechanism (LOM), dual-sites mechanism with O-O bond coupling, proton acceptor mechanism, and cation dissolution mechanism. The representative researches on theoretical calculation and descriptors are highlighted. In the end, present challenges are discussed and suggestions that are potentially interesting for future studies are provided for the hotly developed field. We hope the review will become an important tutorial for the field, pushing forwards the fast exploration of advanced OER electrocatalysts.

Key words： oxygen evolution reaction catalytic mechanism catalytic active site metal oxide

Published: Online: 2022-12-09

CLC number:

O643.36

Fund:National Natural Science Foundation of China (51902200) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (19ZR1425300).

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Sihong
	SONG Fang

Cite this article:

WANG Sihong,SONG Fang. Research Progress in Oxygen Evolution Reaction Mechanism of Metal Oxides[J]. Materials Reports, 2022, 36(23): 21030163-13.

URL:

http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.21030163 OR http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2022/V36/I23/21030163

1 Lewis N S, Nocera D G. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(43), 15729.
2 Cook T R, Dogutan D K, Reece S Y, et al. Chemical Reviews, 2010, 110(11), 6474.
3 Chu S, Majumdar A. Nature, 2012, 488(7411), 294.
4 Suen N T, Hung S F, Quan Q, et al. Chemical Society Reviews, 2017, 46(2), 337.
5 Walter M G, Warren E L, Mckone J R, et al. Chemical Reviews, 2010, 110(11), 6446.
6 Hunter B M, Gray H B, Muller A M. Chemical Reviews, 2016, 116(22), 14120.
7 Tahir M, Pan L, Idrees F, et al. Nano Energy, 2017, 37, 136.
8 Bockris J O M. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1956, 24(4), 817.
9 Doyle R L, Lyons M E G. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2013, 15(14), 5224.
10 Man I C, Su H Y, Calle-Vallejo F, et al. Chemcatchem, 2011, 3(7), 1159.
11 Fang Y H, Liu Z P. ACS Catalysis, 2014, 4(12), 4364.
12 Lyons M E G, Brandon M P. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2010, 641(1-2), 119.
13 Meyer R E. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1960, 107(10), 847.
14 Dau H, Limberg C, Reier T, et al. ChemCatChem, 2010, 2(7), 724.
15 Trasatti S. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 1980, 111(1), 125.
16 Trasatti S. Electrochimica Acta, 1984, 29(11), 1503.
17 Rossmeisl J, Qu Z W, Zhu H, et al. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2007, 607(1), 83.
18 Rossmeisl J, Logadottir A, Nørskov J K. Chemical Physics, 2005, 319(1), 178.
19 Damjanovic A, Jovanovic B. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 1976, 123(3), 374.
20 Rosenthal D J, Lawrence J H. Medical Clinics of North America, 1956, 40(5), 1515.
21 Bockris J O M, Otagawa T. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1983, 87(15), 2960.
22 Binninger T, Mohamed R, Waltar K, et al. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5, 1.
23 Pan Y, Xu X, Zhong Y, et al. Nature Communication, 2020, 11(1), 2002.
24 Liu J, Jia E, Stoerzinger K A, et al. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2020, 124(28), 15386.
25 Grimaud A, Diaz-Morales O, Han B, et al. Nature Chemistry, 2017, 9(5), 457.
26 Wang X, Pan Z, Chu X, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2019, 58(34), 11720.
27 Zhao J W, Li C F, Shi Z X, et al. Research, 2020, 2020, 6961578.
28 Wohlfahrt-Mehrens M, Heitbaum J. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry, 1987, 237(2), 251.
29 Fierro S, Nagel T, Baltruschat H, et al. Electrochemistry Communications, 2007, 9(8), 1969.
30 Kasian O, Geiger S, Li T, et al. Energy & Environmental Science, 2019, 12(12), 3548.
31 Kasian O, Grote J P, Geiger S, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(9), 2488.
32 Macounová K, Jirkovský J, Makarova M V, et al. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 2009, 13(6), 959.
33 Stoerzinger K A, Diaz-Morales O, Kolb M, et al. ACS Energy Letters, 2017, 2(4), 876.
34 Zhang M, De Respinis M, Frei H. Nature Chemisty, 2014, 6(4), 362.
35 Merrill M, Worsley M, Wittstock A, et al. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2014, 717, 177.
36 Trzesniewski B J, Diaz-Morales O, Vermaas D A, et al. Journal of the American Chemisty Society, 2015, 137(48), 15112.
37 Wang H Y, Hung S F, Hsu Y Y, et al. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2016, 7(23), 4847.
38 Ullman A M, Brodsky C N, Li N, et al. Journal of the American Chemisty Society, 2016, 138(12), 4229.
39 Pasquini C, Zaharieva I, Gonzalez-Flores D, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2019, 141(7), 2938.
40 Roy C, Sebok B, Scott S B, et al. Nature Catalysis, 2018, 1(11), 820.
41 Lee S, Banjac K, Lingenfelder M, et al. Angewandte Chemie-Internatio-nal Edition, 2019, 58(30), 10295.
42 Baran J D, Grönbeck H, Hellman A. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, 136(4), 1320.
43 Busch M, Halck N B, Kramm U I, et al. Nano Energy, 2016, 29, 126.
44 Surendranath Y, Kanan M W, Nocera D G. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2010, 132(46), 16501.
45 She S, Zhu Y, Chen Y, et al. Advanced Energy Materials, 2019, 9(20), 1900429.
46 Curcio A, Wang J, Wang Z, et al. Advanced Functional Materials, 2021, 31(4), 2008077.
47 Song F, Busch M M, Lassalle-Kaiser B, et al. ACS Central Science, 2019, 5(3), 558.
48 Bai L, Lee S, Hu X. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2021, 60(6), 3095.
49 Gao Z W, Liu J Y, Chen X M, et al. Advanced Materials, 2019, 31(11), 1804769.
50 Rouxel J. Chemistry-A European Journal, 1996, 2(9), 1053.
51 Tarascon J M, Vaughan G, Chabre Y, et al. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 1999, 147(1), 410.
52 Grimaud A, Hong W T, Shao-Horn Y, et al. Nature Materials, 2016, 15(2), 121.
53 Huang Z F, Song J, Du Y, et al. Nature Energy, 2019, 4(4), 329.
54 Wang J, Kim S J, Liu J, et al. Nature Catalysis, 2021, 4(3), 212.
55 Wu H, Yang T, Du Y, et al. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(52), 180431.
56 Zagalskaya A, Evazzade I, Alexandrov V. ACS Energy Letters, 2021, 6(3), 1124.
57 Creazzo F, Galimberti D R, Pezzotti S, et al. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2019, 150(4), 041721.
58 Yang L, Wu Y, Wu F, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2020, 8(40), 20946.
59 Gono P, Pasquarello A. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2020, 152(10), 104712.
60 Zhao Z J, Liu S, Zha S, et al. Nature Reviews Materials, 2019, 4(12), 792.
61 Bockris J O. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1984, 131(2), 290.
62 Zheng Y, Jiao Y, Zhu Y, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2017, 139(9), 3336.
63 Suntivich J, May K J, Gasteiger H A, et al. Science, 2011, 334(6061), 1383.
64 Grimaud A, May K J, Carlton C E, et al. Nature Communications, 2013, 4, 2439.