颗粒增强金属基复合材料界面结合强度的表征:理论模型、有限元模拟和实验测试

doi:10.11896/cldb.201905019

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (3406KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Metal matrix composites show excellent comprehensive properties and wide applications, in which the interfacial bonding of the reinforcement phase and the matrix is one of the key factors affecting the properties of the materials, and the interfacial bonding strength is the most important quantitative parameter to measure the interface bonding. So far, researchers have developed numerous methods for measuring the interfacial strength of composite materials, including micromechanical measurements and macroscopic experimental method. The former has been proposed in the early stage and is still in use today, including single-fiber pull-out method, single fiber fracture method and micro-bond test method. The latter evaluate the interfacial stress state based on the macroscopic properties of materials, including transverse bending test, transverse tensile test and guide-groove shear test. Besides, according to whether there is a need to destroy the interface during the measurement process, the measu-ring method can be divided into non-destructive methods such as acoustic emission, acoustic microscopy, Raman spectroscopy and destructive methods which need to destroy the interface to achieve measurement.
Great efforts have been put into the measurement and characterization of the interfacial bonding strength of composites and fruitful results have been achieved over the years. Nevertheless, these methods mainly focus on fiber reinforced metal composites. For the particles reinforced metal composites, these testing methods are difficult to work because of the particularity of particle phases in shape and size, which lead to the lag of development in quantitative characterization of interfacial bonding strength of particle reinforced metal matrix composites.
Aiming at measuring the interface strength between reinforcement and matrix, finite element simulation based on the theoretical model is employed by researchers to characterize the bonding strength of the interface, which possesses a certain instructive in the prediction of interfacial bonding strength of composites as well. However, in the process of modeling and calculation, the shape, distribution state of particles and the deformation mode of the interface are simplified to a large extent, consequently, there is always a certain error between the result and the actual situation. In this case, the researchers began to seek to quantitatively characterize the interface bonding strength by means of experimental met-hods, that is characterizing the interfacial bonding strength by measuring the shear strength or tensile strength at the interface.
In this article, a theoretical model of interfacial bonding strength prediction based on different principles is summarized for particle reinforced metal matrix composites. The finite element simulation method and experimental testing method for quantitative characterization of interface bon-ding strength are discussed. It is expected to provide a reference for the interface design and the control of interface strength.

Key words： metal matrix composites reinforced with particles interface bonding strength

Published: 12 March 2019

CLC number:

TB331

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	QIU Bo
	XING Shuming
	DONG Qi

Cite this article:

QIU Bo,XING Shuming,DONG Qi. Characterization of Interfacial Bonding Strength of Particles Reinforced MetalMatrix Composites: Theory Model, Finite Element Simulation andExperimental Test[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(5): 862-870.

URL:

http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.201905019 OR http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2019/V33/I5/862

1 Hahm M G, Nam J, Choi M. Nanotechnology,2015,26(21),603.
2 Muralidharan N, Chockalingam K, Dinaharan I, et al. Journal of Alloys & Compounds,2018,735(25),2167.
3 Suganya P G, Subramanian R, Murugan N, et al. Journal of Mechanical Science & Technology,2017,31(8),3755.
4 Hai Q. Computational Materials Science,2014,89(12),102.
5 You J H, Lutz W, Gerger H, et al. International Journal of Solids & Structures,2009,46(25-26),4277.
6 Nishikawa M, Okabe T, Takeda N. Materials Science & Engineering A,2008,480(1-2),549.
7 Nishikawa M, Okabe T, Hemmi K, et al. International Journal of Solids & Structures,2008,45(14-15),4098.
8 Qin W Z, Yu J R, He J Q, et al. Chinese Polymer Bulletin,2013(2),14(in Chinese).
秦文贞,于俊荣,贺建强,等.高分子通报,2013(2),14.
9 Wood J R, Zhao Q, Frogley M D, et al. Physical Review B,2000,62(11),7571.
10 Silk J R, Dashwood R J, Chater R J. Surface & Interface Analysis,2011,43(1-2),488.
11 Song J, Guo Q, Ouyang Q, et al. Materials Science & Engineering A,2015,644,79.
12 Mortensen A, Llorca J. Materials Today,2010,9(6),1.
13 Chen G, Yang W, Xin L, et al. Journal of Alloys & Compounds,2018,735(25),777.
14 Muolo M L, Valenza F, Passerone A, et al. Materials Science & Engineering A,2008,495(1-2),153.
15 Quéré D. Annual Review of Materials Research,2008,38(38),71.
16 Sobczak N, Singh M, Asthana R. Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science,2005,9(4),241.
17 Fang X, Fan T X, Zhang D. Materials Review A: Review Papers,2013,27(6),130(in Chinese).
房鑫,范同祥,张荻.材料导报:综述篇,2013,27(6),130.
18 Zhang C, Fan T, Cao W, et al. Acta Materialia,2009,57(12),3623.
19 Chen J, Gu M Y, Pan F S. Metallurgical & Materials Transactions A,2001,32(8),2033.
20 Dudiy S, Lundqvist B. Physical Review B,2001,64(4),314.
21 Smith J R, Zhang W. Acta Materialia,2000,48(18-19),4395.
22 Zhang W, Smith J R. Physical Review Letters,2000,85(15),3225.
23 Siegel D J, Hector L G, Adams J B. Physical Review B,2002,65(8),5415.
24 Hoekstra J, Kohyama M. Physical Review B,1998,57(4),2334.
25 Hong T, Smith J R, Srolovitz D J. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology,1994,8(8),837.
26 Li S, Arsenault R J, Jena P. Journal of Applied Physics,1988,64(11),6246.
27 Tsoga A, Ladas S, Nikolopoulos P. Acta Materialia,1997,45(9),3515.
28 Li H T, Chen L F, Yuan X, et al. Journal of the American Ceramic Society,2011,94(S1),154.
29 Shao J C, Xiao B L, Wang Q Z, et al. Composites Science & Technology,2011,71(1),39.
30 Suh Y S, Joshi S P, Ramesh K T. Acta Materialia,2009,57(19),5848.
31 Qu S, Siegmund T, Huang Y, et al. Composites Science & Technology,2005,65(7-8),1244.
32 Kang G, Shao X, Guo S. Materials Science & Engineering A,2008,487(1-2),431.
33 Wang X, Li J, Zhang Y, et al. Journal of Alloys & Compounds,2016,695,2124.
34 Meng Q, Wang Z. Engineering Fracture Mechanics,2015,142,170.
35 Shao X J, Kang G Z, Guo S J, et al. Acta Material Composite Sinica,2010,27(3),128(in Chinese).
邵雪娇,康国政,郭素娟,等.复合材料学报,2010,27(3),128.
36 Chawla N, Ganesh V V, Wunsch B. Scripta Materialia,2004,51(2),161.
37 Teng Y H, Boyd J D. Composites,1994,25(10),906.
38 陈刚,赵玉涛,张振亚,等.中国专利,CN102494997A,2012.
39 Bao C G, Wang E Z, Gao Y M, et al. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University,2000,34(1),41(in Chinese).
鲍崇高,王恩泽,高义民,等.西安交通大学报,2000,34(1),41.
40 Wang J. Effect of interface improvement on mechanical properties of Al₂O₃p/steel composites. Master’s Thesis, Kunming University of Science and Technology, China,2015(in Chinese).
王健.界面改善对Al₂O₃p/钢基复合材料力学性能的影响.硕士学位论文,昆明理工大学,2015.
41 Guo X, Guo Q, Li Z, et al. Scripta Materialia,2016,114,56.
42 Kim Y, Lee J C. Materials Science & Engineering A,2006,420(1),8.
43 Jarzaber Dariusz M, Chmielewski M, et al. Composites Part A,2015,76,124.
44 Dariusz M, Michal Milczarek, Tomasz Wojciechowski, et al. Ceramics International,2017,43(6),5283.
45 Chen C, Xie Y, Yin S, et al. Materials Letters,2016,173,76.