形状记忆聚合物表面响应性润湿性研究进展

doi:10.11896/cldb.20090319

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (13058KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The wettability is an important property of a solid material surface, which can affect various functions of the material. Now, the surfaces with fixed wettability cannot meet the complex and changeable application environment, and thus developing the surfaces with responsive wettability is highly desired. In this context, the stimulated responsive wettability on shape-memory polymer (SMP) surface, which exhibits the advantages of simplicity, convenience and controllability, is potentially used in the fields of droplet directional transmission, bubble collection, and oil-water separation.
It is well known that the microstructure of the SMP surface and the shape-memory programming method are the main approaches to control the responsive wettability of the SMP surface. Although many publications have focused on the issues, the systematic and in-depth discussion about how the above two aspects actuated the responsive wettability of SMP surface is still lacking.
In this paper, from the viewpoints of the different microstructures on SMP surface (micropillar array, porous structure, wrinkle structure, and binary hybrid structure) and different programming methods (vertical hot pressing, inclined hot pressing, selective hot pressing, and hot stretching), we summarize the latest progress for the stimulated responsive wettability on SMP surface; in which, the influences of programming methods and shape memory recovery parameters on the stimulated responsive wettability of SMP surface are highlighted. Finally, the challenges and development trends of the current SMP based responsive wettability surface are proposed.
This paper reviews the latest progress of the influence of microstructure and programming methods on the responsive wettability of SMP surface, which is expected to help researchers in the material field deepen their understanding on SMP based responsive wettability surfaces, andto provide technical and theoretical guidance for developing the smart responsive wettability surface.

Key words： stimulated responsive wettability shape-memory polymer microstructure programming

Published: 10 November 2022 Online: 2022-11-03

CLC number:

TQ317.3

Fund:Youth Nature Science Foundation Program of Jiangxi Province (20202BABL214018), and Technology Research Project of Jiangxi Education Department (GJJ190352).

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Mian
	ZHANG Quanchao
	AO Haiyong
	WAN Yizao

Cite this article:

WANG Mian,ZHANG Quanchao,AO Haiyong, et al. Research Progress of Stimulated Responsive Wettability on Shape-memory Polymer Surfaces[J]. Materials Reports, 2022, 36(21): 20090319-9.

URL:

http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.20090319 OR http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2022/V36/I21/20090319

1 Young T. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1805, 95, 65.
2 Liu K, Jiang L. Annual Review of Materials Research, 2012, 42(1), 231.
3 Lv J, Song Y, Jiang L, et al. ACS Nano, 2014, 8(4), 3152.
4 Zhang F, Zhao L, Chen H, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English, 2008, 47(13), 2466.
5 Zheng Y, Bai H, Huang Z, et al. Nature, 2010, 463(7281), 640.
6 Li Y, Zhao C. ACS Catalysis, 2017, 7(4), 2535.
7 Meuler A J, McKinley G H, Cohen R E. ACS Nano, 2010, 4(12), 7048.
8 Ju J, Bai H, Zheng Y, et al. Nature Communications, 2012, 3, 1247.
9 George J E, Rodrigues V R M, Mathur D, et al. Materials & Design, 2016, 100, 8.
10 Andreeva D V, Fix D, Mohwald H, et al. Advanced Materials, 2008, 20(14), 2789.
11 Ranella A, Barberoglou M, Bakogianni S, et al. Acta Biomaterialia, 2010, 6(7), 2711.
12 Yao X, Hu Y, Grinthal A, et al. Nature Materials, 2013, 12(6), 529.
13 Hou S, Zhao H, Zhao L, et al. Advanced Materials, 2013, 25(11), 1547.
14 Wang N, Xiong D, Deng Y, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 7(11), 6260.
15 Huber D L, Manginell R P, Samara M A, et al. Science, 2003, 301(5631), 352.
16 Song H, Chen D L. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English, 2006, 45(44), 7336.
17 Brown P S, Atkinson O D, Badyal J P. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2014, 6(10), 7504.
18 Wenzel R N. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 1936, 28(8), 988.
19 Huang X, Sun Y, Soh S. Advanced Materials, 2015, 27(27), 4062.
20 Liu H, Jiang L. Small, 2016, 12(1), 9.
21 Cassie A B D, Baxter S. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 1944, 40, 546.
22 Liu H, Ding Y, Ao Z, et al. Small, 2015, 11(15), 1782.
23 Manna U, Lynn D M. Advanced Materialsv, 2015, 27(19), 3007.
24 Li J, Jing Z, Zha F, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2014, 6(11), 8868.
25 Feng X, Feng L, Jin M, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2004, 126(1), 62.
26 Wu M, Ma B, Pan T, et al. Advanced Functional Materials, 2016, 26(4), 569.
27 Zhang D, Cheng Z, Kang H, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(14), 3701.
28 Wong W S Y, Gutruf P, Sriram S, et al. Advanced Functional Materials, 2016, 26(3), 399.
29 Chung J Y, Youngblood J P, Stafford C M. Soft Matter, 2007, 3(9), 1163.
30 Lendlein A, Kelch S. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2002, 41(12), 2034.
31 Leng J, Lan X, Liu Y, et al. Progress in Materials Science, 2011, 56(7), 1077.
32 Chen C M, Yang S. Advanced Materials, 2014, 26(8), 1283.
33 García-Huete N, Cuevas J, Laza J, et al. Polymers, 2015, 7(9), 1674.
34 Jiang Y, Mansfeld U, Fang L, et al. Materials & Design, 2019, 163, 107530.
35 Park J K, Kim S. Lab on a Chip, 2017, 17(10), 1793.
36 Bai X, Yang Q, Fang Y, et al. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 383, 123143.
37 Lyu T, Cheng Z, Zhang D, et al. ACS Nano, 2016, 10(10), 9379.
38 Chen C M, Chiang C L, Yang S. Langmuir, 2015, 31(35), 9523.
39 Ge P, Wang S, Zhang J, et al. Materials Horizons, 2020, 7(10), 2566.
40 Cheng Z, Zhang D, Lyu T, et al. Advanced Functional Materials, 2018, 28(7), 1705002.
41 Zhang A, Bai H, Li L. Chmmical Reviews, 2015, 115(18), 9801.
42 Bertrand A, Bousquet A, Lartigau-Dagron C, et al. Chemical Communications, 2016, 52(61), 9562.
43 Zhao L, Zhao J, Liu Y, et al. Small, 2016, 12(24), 3327.
44 Wu C H, Lu C S, Chen W L, et al. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 2018, 303(2), 1700433.
45 Zhang L, Zhao J, Xu J, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020, 12(37), 42314.
46 Han Y, Liu Y, Wang W, et al. Soft Matter, 2016, 12(10), 2708.
47 Zhao L, Zhang L, Zhao J, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(1), 1563.
48 Chen H, Zhang P, Zhang L, et al. Nature, 2016, 532(7597), 85.
49 Tian Y, Su B, Jiang L. Advanced Materials, 2014, 26(40), 6872.
50 Park K C, Kim P, Grinthal A, et al. Nature, 2016, 531(7592), 78.
51 You I, Lee T G, Nam Y S, et al. ACS Nano, 2014, 8(9), 9016.
52 Phillips K R, England G T, Sunny S, et al. Chemical Society Reviews, 2016, 45(2), 281.
53 Wang J, Sun L, Zou M, et al. Science Advances, 2017, 3(6), e1700004.