Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (17): 25100125-10    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.25100125
  无机非金属及其复合材料 |
硫酸盐环境现浇玻璃粉-水泥砂浆劣化机制
赵高文1,2,*, 方昱川1, 彭丰足1, 王卓1, 丁士君1,3
1 长安大学公路学院,西安 710064
2 长安大学特殊地区公路工程教育部重点实验室,西安 710064
3 国网电力工程研究院有限公司,北京 100069
Degradation Mechanisms of Cast-in-situ Glass Powder-Cement Mortar Under
Sulfate Attack
ZHAO Gaowen1,2,*, FANG Yuchuan1, PENG Fengzu1, WANG Zhuo1, DING Shijun1,3
1 School of Highway, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China
2 Key Laboratory for Special Area Highway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China
3 State Grid Electric Power Engineering Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100069, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 49036KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 用废弃玻璃粉(GP)替代部分水泥是固废消纳的手段之一,然而玻璃粉替代水泥现浇砂浆在硫酸盐环境中的劣化机制尚不明确。采用玻璃粉替代水泥(替代率0%、20%、40%、60%)制备砂浆试样,并在质量分数为10%的Na2SO4溶液中开展180 d腐蚀试验,通过表观劣化特征、力学特性及孔隙分布测试手段,并结合扫描电镜、能谱分析及X射线衍射等微观及矿物学表征,揭示硫酸盐环境下不同替代率玻璃粉现浇砂浆的劣化机制。结果表明,玻璃粉存在“双阈值效应”,即20%玻璃粉替代率时通过火山灰-离子腐蚀竞争抑制膨胀,替代率达40%及以上时Na+溶出与稀释效应促进石膏和芒硝结晶,加速腐蚀劣化;20%替代组抗腐蚀性最优,180 d抗压、抗折强度损失率分别为18.50%、22.52%,体积膨胀率为0.015%,抑制了钙矾石生成并形成无定形硅硫酸盐凝胶,将膨胀破坏转化为溶解劣化;替代率达40%及以上时引发“稀释-溶蚀”负效应,60%组因有效水化成分不足形成大孔通道,SO42-扩散速率激增,孔洞率达3.20%,强度活性指数下降43.61%。本研究为盐湖和盐渍土环境现浇混凝土耐久性设计提供理论支撑,证实20%玻璃粉替代可实现固废高值化利用与腐蚀防护协同优化。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
赵高文
方昱川
彭丰足
王卓
丁士君
关键词:  玻璃粉  现浇砂浆  硫酸盐腐蚀  劣化机制  双阈值效应    
Abstract: Utilizing waste glass powder (GP) as a partial cement replacement offers a promising approach for solid waste valorization;however, the deterioration mechanism of cast-in-situ mortar incorporating GP under sulfate attack remains unclear. In this work, mortar specimens with GP substitution rates of 0%, 20%, 40%, and 60% were subjected to 180-day corrosion testing in a 10% Na2SO4 solution. Based on the evaluation of macroscopic deterioration, mechanical performance, and pore structure, combined with SEM, EDS, and XRD analyses, the sulfate-induced degradation mechanism at varying GP contents was clarified. The results reveal a “dual-threshold effect” of GP:at 20% substitution, the competition between pozzolanic reactions and sulfate-ion intrusion effectively suppresses expansive damage;whereas when the substitution rate reaches 40% or more, it facilitates gypsum and mirabilite crystallization through Na+ leaching and dilution effects, thereby accelerating deterioration. The 20% GP mixture exhibits the best corrosion resistance, with only 18.50% and 22.52% reductions in compressive and flexural strength and a volumetric expansion of 0.015% after 180 days of corrosion, attributed to inhibited ettringite formation and the generation of amorphous silica-sulfate gels that shift the deterioration mode from expansion to dissolution dominated. In contrast, when the GP substitution rate reaches 40% or more, a pronounced “dilution-leaching” effect is triggered, and the 60% GP mixture develops enlarged pore channels due to insufficient reactive hydration phases, resulting in markedly enhanced SO42- transport, porosity up to 3.20%, and a 43.61% reduction in strength activity index. These findings provide theoretical guidance for the durability design of cast-in-situ concrete in saline-lake and sulfate-rich soil environments and confirm that a 20% GP substitution achieves synergistic enhancement of waste utilization efficiency and resistance to sulfate-induced corrosion.
Key words:  glass powder    cast-in-situ mortar    sulfate attack    deterioration mechanism    dual-threshold effect
出版日期:  2026-09-10      发布日期:  2026-09-22
ZTFLH:  TU528  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(52378322);博新计划(BX20200287);陕西省青年项目B类(2026JC-YXQN-158);陕西省重点研发项目(2025CY-YBXM-156)
通讯作者:  *赵高文,博士,长安大学公路学院教授、博士研究生导师。目前主要从事岩土工程、结构工程等方面的研究。007gwzhao@chd.edu.cn   
引用本文:    
赵高文, 方昱川, 彭丰足, 王卓, 丁士君. 硫酸盐环境现浇玻璃粉-水泥砂浆劣化机制[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(17): 25100125-10.
ZHAO Gaowen, FANG Yuchuan, PENG Fengzu, WANG Zhuo, DING Shijun. Degradation Mechanisms of Cast-in-situ Glass Powder-Cement Mortar Under
Sulfate Attack. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(17): 25100125-10.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.25100125  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I17/25100125
1 Shan Y S, Mao K J. Ocean Development and Management, 2021, 38(8), 77 (in Chinese).
单亦石, 毛可佳. 海洋开发与管理, 2021, 38(8), 77.
2 Xia L F, Guo Z N, Qiu L, et al. China Cement, 2022(11), 14 (in Chinese).
夏凌风, 郭珍妮, 邱林, 等. 中国水泥, 2022(11), 14.
3 Wang F Z, Mai L Q. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 51(9), 2126 (in Chinese).
王发洲, 麦立强. 硅酸盐学报, 2023, 51(9), 2126.
4 Lu J X, Zhan B J, Duan Z H, et al. Materials & Design, 2017, 135, 102.
5 Cao W L, Zhao Y X, Ye T P. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019, 51(6), 1(in Chinese).
曹万林, 赵羽习, 叶涛萍. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2019, 51(6), 1.
6 Mohammed T K, Hama S M. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2022, 7, 1.
7 Aliabdo A A, Abd Elmoaty M, Aboshama A Y. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 124, 866.
8 Farooq O, Bilal H, Cavaleri L, et al. Developments in the Built Environment, 2023, 14, 100156.
9 Yu Z, Wen B, Wang H. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 473, 140999.
10 Zhang Y K, Zhang T, Zhang R F, et al. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2016, 33(9), 10 (in Chinese).
张永康, 张田, 张荣飞, 等. 铁道工程学报, 2016, 33(9), 10.
11 Yang B, Hu X, Li A, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 478, 141401.
12 Zhang H, Ji T, Liu H. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 248, 118675.
13 Zou D, Qin S, Liu T, et al. Cement and Concrete Research, 2021, 139, 106284.
14 Bellmann F, Möser B, Stark J. Cement and Concrete Research, 2006, 36(2), 358.
15 Durgun M Y, Sevinç A H. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 57, 104849.
16 Carsana M, Frassoni M, Bertolini L. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2014, 45, 39.
17 Gollop R S, Taylor H F W. Cement and Concrete Research, 1995, 25(7), 1581.
18 Wang D, Zhang Y, Li Z, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 369, 130620.
19 Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Test methods of cement and concrete for highway engineering:JTG E30-2005. China Communication Press, China, 2005 (in Chinese).
中华人民共和国交通部. 公路工程水泥及水泥混凝土试验规程:JTG E30-2005, 人民交通出版社, 2005.
20 Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Test method of cement mortar strength (ISO method):GB/T 17671-2021. Standards Press of China, China, 2021 (in Chinese).
中国国家标准化管理委员会. 水泥胶砂强度检验方法(ISO法):GB/T 17671-2021, 中国标准出版社, 2021.
21 Gao X, Liao C, Qi X, et al. Sustainability, 2023, 15(7), 5736.
22 Li F, Yang J, Li L H. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(9), 3208 (in Chinese).
李方, 杨健, 李粒珲. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(9), 3208.
23 Kunther W, Lothenbach B, Scrivener K L. Cement and Concrete Research, 2013, 46, 23.
24 Liu X, Feng P, Shen X Y, et al. Materials Reports, 2021, 35(9), 9157 (in Chinese).
刘新, 冯攀, 沈叙言, 等. 材料导报, 2021, 35(9), 9157.
25 Tang R F, Zhang J L, Wang Z M, et al. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(9), 109 (in Chinese).
唐芮枫, 张佳乐, 王子明, 等. 材料导报, 2023, 37(9), 109.
26 Cao Q, Han B, Chen L, et al. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 370, 130669.
27 Zhu X H, Li Q, Chen P, et al. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2021, 49(5), 901 (in Chinese).
朱效宏, 李青, 陈平, 等. 硅酸盐学报, 2021, 49(5), 901.
28 Mobasher M. Measurement of accidental radiation exposure by induced point defects in smartphone screens. Ph. D. Thesis, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, FR, 2024.
29 Bénard P, Garrault S, Nonat A, et al. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2005, 25(11), 1877.
30 Mejdi M, Wilson W, Saillio M, et al. Cement and Concrete Research, 2022, 151, 106610.
31 Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Fly ash for cement and concrete:GB/T 1596-2017, Standards Press of China, China, 2017 (in Chinese).
中国国家标准化管理委员会. 用于水泥和混凝土中的粉煤灰:GB/T 1596-2017, 中国标准出版社, 2017.
32 Gaitero J J, Campillo I, Guerrero A. Cement and Concrete Research, 2008, 38(8), 1112.
33 Bulatovic V, Melesev M, Radeka M, et al. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 152, 614.
34 Redden R, Neithalath N. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2014, 45(1), 46.
35 Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for durability assessment of existing concrete structures:GB/T 51355-2019, China Architecture & Building Press, China, 2019(in Chinese).
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 既有混凝土结构耐久性评定标准:GB/T 51355-2019, 中国建筑工业出版社, 2019.
[1] 于代东, 马玉薇, 李刚, 王爱芹, 黄维, 王靖超. 基于机器学习方法对不同掺量废玻璃粉混凝土抗压强度的预测研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(6): 25030056-15.
[2] 于代东, 马玉薇, 李刚, 黄维, 汪刘阳. 废玻璃粉-硅灰复合胶凝体系的协同改性作用对混凝土性能的优化研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(13): 25060136-10.
[3] 李琼, 安宝峰, 苏睿, 乔宏霞, 王超群. 废玻璃粉透水混凝土物理性能及复合胶凝体系微观机理研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(8): 23100186-11.
[4] 杨军兆, 张戎令, 薛彦瑾, 王小平, 窦晓峥, 宋毅. 基于分形维数的硫酸盐环境下混凝土抗蚀系数及微观机理研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(7): 24020033-7.
[5] 张学鹏, 张戎令, 杨斌, 肖鹏震, 王小平, 龙朝飞. 冻融-硫酸盐腐蚀耦合作用下早龄期混凝土强度演变及预测模型研究[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(5): 22080059-9.
[6] 靳学昌, 高珺, 李岩, 陈将俊, 刘春静, 赵宁. 玻璃粉体系对MLCC用铜电极浆料性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(z2): 294-297.
[7] 刘娟红, 马虹波, 段品佳, 周昱程, 郭子栋. 硫酸盐干湿循环环境下超深井井壁混凝土抗腐蚀性能[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35(12): 12081-12086.
[8] 侯晨阳, 付明, 刘雷, 尹光, 汪小红, 吕文中, 范琳. 玻璃粉对PERC太阳能电池铝电极结构和性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2020, 34(22): 22005-22009.
[9] 马晓波, 王进卿, 池作和, 张光学, 詹明秀. h-BN基复合陶瓷涂层防锅炉受热面的硫酸盐腐蚀性能[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(6): 960-964.
[1] Yanzhen WANG, Mingming CHEN, Chengyang WANG. Preparation and Electrochemical Properties Characterization of High-rate SiO2/C Composite Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 357 -361 .
[2] Yimeng XIA, Shuai WU, Feng TAN, Wei LI, Qingmao WEI, Chungang MIN, Xikun YANG. Effect of Anionic Groups of Cobalt Salt on the Electrocatalytic Activity of Co-N-C Catalysts[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 362 -367 .
[3] Qingshun GUAN,Jian LI,Ruyuan SONG,Zhaoyang XU,Weibing WU,Yi JING,Hongqi DAI,Guigan FANG. A Survey on Preparation and Application of Aerogels Based on Nanomaterials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 384 -390 .
[4] Lijing YANG,Zhengxian LI,Chunliang HUANG,Pei WANG,Jianhua YAO. Producing Hard Material Coatings by Laser-assisted Cold Spray:a Technological Review[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(3): 412 -417 .
[5] Zhiqiang QIAN,Zhijian WU,Shidong WANG,Huifang ZHANG,Haining LIU,Xiushen YE,Quan LI. Research Progress in Preparation of Superhydrophobic Coatings on Magnesium Alloys and Its Application[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 102 -109 .
[6] Wen XI,Zheng CHEN,Shi HU. Research Progress of Deformation Induced Localized Solid-state Amorphization in Nanocrystalline Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 116 -121 .
[7] Xing LIANG, Guohua GAO, Guangming WU. Research Development of Vanadium Oxide Serving as Cathode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 12 -33 .
[8] Hao ZHANG,Yongde HUANG,Yue GUO,Qingsong LU. Technological and Process Advances in Robotic Friction Stir Welding[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 128 -134 .
[9] Laima LUO, Mengyao XU, Xiang ZAN, Xiaoyong ZHU, Ping LI, Jigui CHENG, Yucheng WU. Progress in Irradiation Damage of Tungsten and Tungsten AlloysUnder Different Irradiation Particles[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 41 -46 .
[10] Fengsen MA,Yan YU,Jie ZHANG,Haibo CHEN. A State-of-the-art Review of Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Biomaterials[J]. Materials Reports, 2018, 32(1): 76 -85 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed