Please wait a minute...
材料导报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (15): 24070080-9    https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.24070080
  无机非金属及其复合材料 |
单轴压缩下含平行裂隙群类岩石的变形破裂研究:结合砂型3D打印与DIC技术
张凯1, 张科2, 保瑞3,4,*, 杨溢5
1 昆明理工大学建筑工程学院,昆明 650500
2 昆明理工大学电力工程学院,昆明 650500
3 昆明理工大学国土资源工程学院,昆明 650093
4 中国有色金属工业昆明勘察设计研究院有限公司,昆明 650051
5 昆明理工大学公共安全与应急管理学院,昆明 650093
Study on Deformation and Fracture of Rock-like Specimens with Parallel Fissure Groups Under Uniaxial Compression:Combining Sand 3D Printing and DIC Technology
ZHANG Kai1, ZHANG Ke2, BAO Rui3,4,*, YANG Yi5
1 Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
2 Faculty of Electric Power Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
3 Faculty of Land Resource Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
4 Kunming Prospecting Design Institute of China Nonferrous Metals Industry Co., Ltd., Kunming 650051, China
5 Faculty of Public Safety and Emergency Management, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
下载:  全 文 ( PDF ) ( 33226KB ) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 平行裂隙群是岩体中常见的缺陷分布形式,对岩体工程的安全和稳定评估至关重要。本工作采用砂型3D打印技术制备了不同倾角含平行裂隙群的类岩石试样,并利用数字图像相关(DIC)技术分析了单轴压缩状态下试样的裂纹搭接、扩展与破坏模式。结果表明:随着裂隙群倾角的逐渐增加,试样的平均峰值强度与平均弹性模量均呈现出先减小后增大的趋势。试样预制裂隙之间的搭接模式共有九种,随着裂隙群倾角的增大,试样裂隙之间存在的搭接模式更少。试样的破坏模式随着角度的变化可分为四种,分别是以中心裂隙为起点的“X”型破坏、沿预制裂隙面的阶梯型对称破坏、沿预制裂隙面的剪切破坏以及侧面劈裂破坏。研究结果为理解裂隙岩体的变形破裂机制提供了参考,同时拓展了砂型3D打印技术在复杂裂隙岩体重构中的应用。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张凯
张科
保瑞
杨溢
关键词:  岩石力学  3D打印  平行裂隙群  裂纹扩展  数字图像相关(DIC)    
Abstract: Parallel fissure groups, as a common defect distribution pattern in rock masses, are critical to the safety and stability assessment of rock engineering. In this study, rock-like specimens containing parallel fissure groups at different inclination angles were prepared by sand 3D printing technology, and the crack coalescence, propagation and failure modes of the specimens under uniaxial compression were analyzed by using di-gital image correlation (DIC) technology. The results show that as the inclination angle of the fissure group gradually increases, the average peak strength and average elastic modulus of the sand 3D printed specimens show a trend of decreasing and then increasing. The coalescence patterns between pre-fabricated fissures of the specimen can be categorized into nine, with fewer coalescence patterns existing between the fissures as the inclination angle of the fissure group increases. The failure modes of sand 3D printed specimens with parallel fissure groups can be categorized into four types with the change of angle, which are “X” type failure starting from the center fissure, step symmetric failure along the pre-fabricated fissure surface, shear failure along the pre-fabricated fissure surface, and side splitting failure. The findings provide a reference for understanding the deformation and fracture mechanism of fissured rock masses, and expand the application of sand 3D printing technology in the reconstruction of complex fissured rock masses.
Key words:  rock mechanics    3D printing    parallel fissure group    crack propagation    digital image correlation (DIC)
出版日期:  2026-08-10      发布日期:  2026-08-31
ZTFLH:  TU45  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(42362034);云南省应用基础研究计划(202401AS070068)
通讯作者:  * 保瑞,工学硕士,高级工程师。主要从事3D打印类材料损伤及破裂行为、岩体3D打印物理重构的研究工作。baorui_0214@126.com   
作者简介:  张凯,昆明理工大学建筑工程学院博士研究生,在张科教授的指导下进行3D打印类材料损伤及破裂行为研究。
引用本文:    
张凯, 张科, 保瑞, 杨溢. 单轴压缩下含平行裂隙群类岩石的变形破裂研究:结合砂型3D打印与DIC技术[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(15): 24070080-9.
链接本文:  
https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/10.11896/cldb.24070080  或          https://www.mater-rep.com/CN/Y2026/V40/I15/24070080
1 Zhang K, Ye J M, Liu X H. Materials Reports, 2022, 36(17), 122(in Chinese).
张科, 叶锦明, 刘享华. 材料导报, 2022, 36(17), 122.
2 Zhu Z Y, Jiang M Y, Yu S Y, et al. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2025, 139, 105058.
3 Yang S Q, Yin P F, Zhang Y C, et al. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2019, 114, 101.
4 Pu C Z, Cao P, Zhao Y L, et al. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(11), 3661(in Chinese).
蒲成志, 曹平, 赵延林, 等. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(11), 3661.
5 Chen X, Liao Z H, Li D J. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(4), 781(in Chinese).
陈新, 廖志红, 李德建. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(4), 781.
6 Su H J, Jing H W, Zhao H H, et al. Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 32(5), 192(in Chinese).
苏海健, 靖洪文, 赵洪辉, 等. 工程力学, 2015, 32(5), 192.
7 Yang X X, Jing H W, Tang C A, et al. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2017, 92, 40.
8 Cao R H, Cao P, Lin H, et al. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2016, 49(3), 763.
9 Chen M, Yang S Q, Gamage R P, et al. Energies, 2019, 12(1), 79.
10 Ju Y, Xie H P, Zheng Z M, et al. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2014, 59(32), 3109(in Chinese).
鞠杨, 谢和平, 郑泽民, 等. 科学通报, 2014, 59(32), 3109.
11 Tian W, Pei Z R, Han N. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(8), 2297(in Chinese).
田威, 裴志茹, 韩女. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(8), 2297.
12 Sharafisafa M, Aliabadian Z, Tahmasebinia F, et al. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2021, 241, 107405.
13 Wang B X, Jin A B, Sun H, et al. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(2), 439(in Chinese).
王本鑫, 金爱兵, 孙浩, 等. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2), 439.
14 Wang B X, Jin A B, Zhao Y Q, et al. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2022, 44(12), 2029(in Chinese).
王本鑫, 金爱兵, 赵怡晴, 等. 工程科学学报, 2022, 44(12), 2029.
15 Jiang L S, Wang X Z, Xu Q, et al. Coal Science and Technology, 2023, 51(11), 84(in Chinese).
蒋力帅, 王鑫哲, 徐清, 等. 煤炭科学技术, 2023, 51(11), 84.
16 Wang W H, Jiang L S, He X, et al. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2024, 43(3), 754(in Chinese).
王文海, 蒋力帅, 何鑫, 等. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2024, 43(3), 754.
17 Mitra S, de Castro AR, El Mansori M. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, 97(1), 1241.
18 Li C, Yan S L, Yang Y Y, et al. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2017, 34(2), 278(in Chinese).
李琛, 晏石林, 杨亚运, 等. 复合材料学报, 2017, 34(2), 278.
19 Zhang K, Zhang K, Liu W L, et al. Materials & Design, 2023, 230, 111944.
20 Tian W, Han N. Strain, 2017, 53(6), e12240.
21 Jiang C, Zhao G F. Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering, 2015, 48(3), 1041.
22 Liu Q S, He F, Deng P H, et al. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9), 3397(in Chinese).
刘泉声, 何璠, 邓鹏海, 等. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9), 3397.
23 Wong L N Y. Einstein H H. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2009, 46(2), 239.
24 Tian W, Wang Z, Zhang L, et al. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3), 961(in Chinese).
田威, 王震, 张丽, 等. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3), 961.
25 Li S Y, He T M, Yin X C. Rock fracture mechanics, Science Press, China, 2016, pp. 66(in Chinese)
李世愚, 和泰名, 尹祥础. 岩石断裂力学, 科学出版社, 2016, pp. 69.
26 Chen S, Qiao C S, Ye Q, et al. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(10), 3612(in Chinese).
陈松, 乔春生, 叶青, 等. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(10), 3612.
27 Gao W, Cui S, Xiao T, et al. Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(10), 3193(in Chinese).
高玮, 崔爽, 肖婷, 等. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46(10), 3193.
[1] 刘向, 朱海峰, 张东生, 毛明杰, 杨秋宁. 3D打印参数对地聚物混凝土力学性能的影响及深度学习预测模型[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(8): 25030205-9.
[2] 席歆玥, 张延生, 杨云波, 李焱, 徐宏殷, 王娟, 郑元勋. 绿筑智建:农业生物质纤维强化再生水泥3D打印绿色建材研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(5): 24080146-7.
[3] 冯冠旗, 左洋博, 孙清保, 李德胜, 张克胜, 张法强, 杨景周. 3D打印极小曲面多孔硅灰石生物陶瓷微观结构与力学性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(13): 25040285-9.
[4] 李科, 沈全锋, 李天雷, 陈俊文, 王雅熙, 昝林峰, 姜流, 冯敏, 魏仁超, 杨志文, 王修云. 在役天然气管道转纯氢输送X42钢断裂力学性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(13): 25070053-7.
[5] 田欣晨, 陈宇, 张亚梅. 3D打印电磁屏蔽混凝土材料研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(12): 25080185-10.
[6] 卢羿汛, 程西云, 陈俊炜, 李赐临. 马来酸酐接枝聚乙烯增强FDM金属3D打印丝材的性能及脱脂工艺研究[J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(12): 24120232-5.
[7] 朱作祥, 骆祚森, 李建林, 邓华锋, 王乐华. 含水状态对硅质胶结砂岩抗拉特性的影响及颗粒流模拟[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(9): 24010198-9.
[8] 李晨晓, 李俊生, 陈雨洁, 颜曼玲, 陈玉蓉, 万帆. 陶瓷材料熔融沉积3D打印研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(8): 24040242-10.
[9] 曾琦, 倪浩涵, 刘伟, 黎超超, 王江伟. 增材制造GH3536回流燃烧室火焰筒主燃孔的微观组织演变与裂纹扩展行为[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(8): 24040055-4.
[10] 牛婉莹, 刘建康, 王志强. 连续纤维增强复合材料3D打印结构拓扑优化及路径规划研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(21): 24080031-10.
[11] 王梦娜, 高旭东, 邵永波, 朱海龙, 杜栖云. 加载频率对EH36/EH690异种高强钢焊接接头腐蚀疲劳裂纹扩展行为的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(20): 24090131-9.
[12] 马亚鹏, 翟文辉, 张东生, 朱涛, 杨秋宁, 毛明杰. 复合外加剂对3D打印砂浆流变与建造性的协同机制及孔结构研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(17): 25030044-8.
[13] 张大旺, 杨欢, 李辉. 3D打印建筑底层荷载的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(16): 24060021-12.
[14] 杨日明, 申秀丽, 董少静. 氢对TC4ELI钛合金疲劳裂纹扩展行为影响[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(14): 24080102-5.
[15] 张大旺, 许晓光, 李辉. 3D打印混凝土的长期性能研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(13): 24030165-13.
[1] . Research Progress on Recycling and Regeneration of Spent Lithium Iron Phosphate Cathode Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(15): 25070030 -10 .
[2] . Research Progress of BiFeO3-SrTiO3 Ceramic Materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(15): 25080005 -14 .
[3] . Research Progress on Highly Efficient and Stable Vanadium Redox Flow Battery Electrolytes[J]. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(15): 25100172 -12 .
[4] . Advances in the Applications of Flexible Vanadium Dioxide Thin Films[J]. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(15): 25100051 -8 .
[5] . Innovative Applications of Functionalized Boron Nitride Nanomaterials in Antitumor Therapy[J]. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(15): 25060102 -13 .
[6] . Preparation of Cerium-doped Vanadium-based Catalysts Derived from MOF and Their Performance in Low-temperature NH3-SCR Denitrification[J]. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(15): 25060179 -7 .
[7] . Cr(Ⅵ) Adsorption-Reduction by Magnetic FeS-modified Iron-based Waterworks Sludge[J]. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(15): 25060164 -8 .
[8] . Synergistic Mechanism and Structure-Property Relationship of Coal Gangue-based Adsorbent for Simultaneous Removal of COD and Ammonia Nitrogen[J]. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(15): 25100004 -10 .
[9] . Sensitivity Analysis of Morphological Deviation to Process Parameters in Windshield Glass Forming[J]. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(15): 25050129 -6 .
[10] . Seismic Response and Fragility Analysis of Aqueduct Structures Based on Endurance Time Analysis Method[J]. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(15): 25110035 -9 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed