| POLYMERS AND POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITES |
|
|
|
|
|
| Effect of Thin SiO2 Film Coating Pd on Mesoporous Pd/SiO2 Catalyzing Hydrogenation of Anthraquinone to Prepare H2O2 |
| LI Dawei1,2, WANG Shudong2,*, SU Hongjiu2, YAN Hua1,2
|
1 Energy College, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
2 Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on the background of the hydrogenation of anthraquinone to produce hydrogen peroxide, Pd/SiO2 catalyst was prepared using mesoporous spherical silica support with an average pore diameter of 12 nm by strong electrostatic adsorption (SEA) method, and Pd particles supported on the catalyst were coated with TEOS to prepare Pd@SiO2/SiO2 spherical particle catalyst for anthraquinone hydrogenation as well. Compared with unmodified Pd/SiO2 spherical catalyst, Pd@SiO2/SiO2 catalyst showed better hydrogenation activity, and the space-time yield was 16.4% higher than that of Pd/SiO2. Besides, it also exhibits 100% selectivity. The prepared Pd@SiO2/SiO2 and Pd/SiO2 catalysts were characterized by physical adsorption (BET), powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), H2-TPR, XPS. After coating, it can be seen that the Pd particle surface has a thin SiO2 film of 0.1 nm, and the specific surface area and pore volume of the catalyst increase, compared with the support, while the pore size decreases. The H2-TPR and XPS characterization results show that, due to the coating of SiO2 film, the binding energy of Pd0 species on Pd@SiO2/SiO2 is higher, and the interaction between Pd particles and carriers is stronger. The above methods make Pd@SiO2/SiO2 catalyst shows higher selectivity and activity.
|
|
Published:
Online: 2023-12-19
|
|
|
|
|
1 Campos-Martin J M, Blanco-Brieva G, Fierro J L G. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2006, 45 (42), 6962.
2 Ferrandez D M P, Croon M H J M D, Schouten J C. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52 (30), 10126.
3 Russo V, Tesser R, Santacesaria E. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52 (3), 1168.
4 Kim H J, Jeon Y K, Park J I. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A-Chemical, 2013, 378(11), 232.
5 Eriksson M, Petersson L G. Surface Science, 1994, 311(1-2), 139.
6 Chen Q. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2006, 14 (8), 708.
7 Thènard. Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 1818, 2(8), 306.
8 Santacesaria E, Serio M D, Russo A. Chemical Engineering Journal, 1999, 54, 2799.
9 Kosydar R, Drelinkiewicz A, Lalik E, et al. Applied Catalysis A:Gene-ral, 2011, 402, 121.
10 Drelinkiewicz A, Waksmundzka-Góra A, Makowski W. Catalysis Communications, 2005, 6, 347.
11 Drelinkiewicz A, Pukkinen A, Kangas R, et al. Catalysis Letters, 2004, 94, 157.
12 Li X, Su H, Ren G, et al. RSC Advances, 2015, 5, 100968.
13 Liu J, Duan S, Xu J, et al. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 2016, 22(S3), 860.
14 Li X, Su H, Li D. Applied Catalysis A:General, 2016, 528, 168.
15 Li D, Su H, Yan Y, et al. Catalysts, 2022, 12(10),1156.
16 Chen Y, Zhang S, Wang Q, et al. Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals, 2021, 52(6), 39.
17 Liang W, Fu J, Chen H, et al. Materials Letters, 2021, 283, 128857.
18 Belykh L B, Skripov N I, Sterenchuk T P, et al. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2021, 2021(44), 4586. |
|
|
|
渝公网安备50019002502923号 © Editorial Office of Materials Reports.
2023, Vol. 37 
