METALS AND METAL MATRIX COMPOSITES |
|
|
|
|
|
Comparative Study on the Cleaning Effect of Potassium Sodium Tartrate and EDTA on Surface Corrosion of Bronze |
BI Jiangyuan1,2, SONG Shupeng1,2,*, DING Xing1,2, KE Deqing2, ZHOU Herong2
|
1 State Key Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China 2 College of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China |
|
|
Abstract In order to analyze the rust removal effect of simulated bronze corrosion and discuss its mechanism, different concentrations of EDTA and potassium sodium tartrate were investigated. Electrochemical test results show that the corrosion rates of both increases with the increase of solution concentration, and EDTA solution with the same concentration are lower than that of potassium sodium tartrate. SEM and XRD results show that 168 h potassium sodium tartrate effectively removes the green harmful rust layer, and the surface of the sample reveals the Cu2O and SnO2 rust layer, while EDTA partly remove the green rust layer, no new substances formed on the sample surface after cleaning. Both EDTA and potassium sodium tartrate are chelating agents. The chelation coordination form and ring formation structures are different, which result in diffe-rent adsorption capacity for Cu2+, and make obvious different cleaning effect.
|
Published: 10 October 2023
Online: 2023-09-28
|
|
Fund:National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFC1522000). |
|
|
1 Wu Y Q, Wang J L, Yang C S, et al. Corrosion Science and Protection Technology, 2012, 24(2), 167 (in Chinese). 吴玉清, 王菊琳, 杨传森, 等. 腐蚀科学与防护技术, 2012, 24(2), 167. 2 Feng S B, Hu F H, Feng L T. Corrosion and Protection, 2009, 30(1). 7(in Chinese). 冯绍彬, 胡芳红, 冯丽婷. 腐蚀与防护, 2009, 30(1), 7. 3 Liao Y. Sciences of Conservation and Archaeology, 2003, 15(2), 20(in Chinese). 廖原. 文物保护与考古科学, 2003, 15(2), 20. 4 Rahmouni K, Takenouti H, Hajjaji N, et al. Electrochimica Acta, 2009, 54(22), 5206. 5 Alfantazi A M, Ahmed T M, Tromans D. Materials & Design, 2009, 30(7), 2425. 6 Scott D A. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 2013, 29(2), 193. 7 Wu Y Q. Study the evaluation indicators and methods of cleaning agent of bronze protective materials. Master's Thesis, Beijing University of Che-mical Technology, China, 2014(in Chinese). 吴玉清. 青铜器保护材料—清洗剂评价指标及评价方法研究, 硕士学位论文, 北京化工大学, 2014. 8 Huo W. Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2022, 37(1), 213(in Chinese). 霍巍. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 37(1), 213. 9 Wang N, Heng J S, Sun S Y, et al. Sciences of Conservation and Archaeology, 2007, 23(4), 45(in Chinese). 王宁, 何积铨, 孙淑云, 等. 文物保护与考古科学, 2007, 23(4), 45. 10 Rahmouni K, Takenouti H, Hajjaji N, et al. Electrochimica Acta, 2009, 54(22), 5206. 11 Li B J, Jiang X D, Pan C X. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(11), 138(in Chinese). 李冰洁, 江旭东, 潘春旭. 材料导报, 2017, 31(11), 138. 12 Li X D, An M M. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(22), 163(in Chinese). 李晓东, 安梅梅. 材料导报, 2017, 31(22), 163. 13 Mauro M, Carlo L, Annamaria G, et al. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2003, 23(4), 147. 14 Alfantazi A M, Ahmed T M, Tromans D. Materials & Design, 2009, 30(7), 2425. 15 Zheng L P. Journal of Chongqing Institute of Technology, 2007, 12(6), 61(in Chinese). 郑利平. 重庆工学院学报, 2007, 12(6), 61. 16 Rahmouni K, Takenouti H, Hajjaji N, et al. Electrochimica Acta, 2009, 54, 5206. 17 Yuan H F, Wang G, Xu M, et al. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2019, 39(12), 3985(in Chinese). 袁海飞, 王刚, 徐敏, 等. 环境科学学报, 2019, 39(12), 3985. 18 Lei M, Tian Z G Y, Liao B H, et al. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2008, 21(1), 150(in Chinese). 雷鸣, 田中干也, 廖柏寒, 等. 环境科学研究, 2008, 21(1), 150. 19 Rood J A, Noll B C, Henderson K W. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 2010, 183(1), 270 20 Ding C M, Chen N S, Li Q, et al. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2005, 22(3), 312(in Chinese). 丁纯梅, 陈宁生, 李倩, 等. 应用化学, 2005, 22(3), 312. |
|
|
|