催化炭膜制备及其强化甲醇水蒸气重整制氢反应

doi:10.11896/cldb.22010107

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (9656KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Steam reforming of methanol (SRM) is an important distributed hydrogen production technology. However, the conversion and yield of traditional reactors are quite inferior due to the constraints of thermodynamic equilibrium and kinetics. Here, catalytic carbon membranes were integrated in the reaction process to strengthen SRM reaction by virtue of the combination effects of catalysis and separation. The chemical structure, microcrystal structure, chemical elements, microscopic morphology and porous structure of the membrane materials were characterized by means of infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, scanning electron microscope and bubble pressure method, respectively. The effects of carbon membrane microstructure, reaction temperature and other factors on the conversion and yield of SRM reaction were investigated. The results show that the integration of catalytic carbon membranes during reaction process significantly enhances the efficiency of SRM reaction. As the reaction temperature increases, the methanol conversion increases, while the hydrogen yield first increases then decreases. When the reaction temperature is 240 ℃, the hydrogen yield is increased by 1.7 times compared to conventional fixed bed.

Key words： hydrogen production methanol steam reforming membrane separation catalyst

Published: 10 September 2023 Online: 2023-09-05

CLC number:

TK91

Fund:National Natural Science Foundation of China (20906063), the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province in China (2021-MS-238), the Scientific Research Project of Liaoning Provincial Department of Education (LJGD2020002) and the Shenyang Youth Science and Technology Project (RC200325).

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Erwen
	ZHANG Bing
	LI Xinming
	JIANG Yuan
	WU Yonghong
	WANG Tonghua

Cite this article:

WANG Erwen,ZHANG Bing,LI Xinming, et al. Fabrication of Catalytic Carbon Membranes and Their Intensification of Hydrogen Production Reaction from Methanol Steam Reforming[J]. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(17): 22010107-5.

URL:

http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.22010107 OR http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2023/V37/I17/22010107

1 Atilhan S, Park S, El-Halwagi M, et al. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 2021, 31, 100668.
2 Zhang B, Zhang S X, Yao R, et al. Journal of Electronic Science and Technology, 2021, 19(2), 100080.
3 Gopinath C S, Nalajala N A. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2019, 9, 1353.
4 Kannah R Y, Kavitha S, Karthikeyan O P, et al. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 319, 124175.
5 Zhang L, Hu X, Hu K, et al. Journal of Power Sources, 2018, 403, 137.
6 Tya A, Kg B, Ai C. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 2020, 157, 108148.
7 Palo D R, Dagle R A, Holladay J D. Chemical Reviews, 2007, 107(10), 3992.
8 Liu G, Jin W, Xu N. Chemical Society Reviews, 2015, 44, 5016.
9 Sá S, Silva H, Sousa J M, et al. Journal of Membrane Science, 2009, 339(1-2), 160.
10 Itoh N, Haraya K. Catalysis Today, 2000, 56(1-3), 103.
11 Sheintuch S M. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 59(10), 2013.
12 Hirota Y, Ishikado A, Uchida Y, et al. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 440, 134.
13 Wu Y, Yao R, Zhang X, et al. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021, 9(3), 105164.
14 Zhang B, Yang C, Zheng Y, et al. Journal of Membrane Science, 2021, 627, 119239.
15 Zhang B, Zhang S, Wu Y, et al. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 2021, 169, 108620.
16 Zhang B, Wang D, Zhou J, et al. Energy Technology, 2017, 5(11), 1990.
17 Garcia G, Arriola E, Chen W-H, et al. Energy, 2021, 217, 119384.
18 Huang Z, Cui F, Kang H, et al. Chemistry of Materials, 2008, 20(15), 5090.
19 Myung Y, Jang D M, Sung T K, et al. ACS Nano, 2010, 4(7), 3789.
20 Yan L, Wang Y, Xiong L, et al. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2009, 35(11), 1960 (in Chineses).
闫丽丽, 王艳, 熊良斌, 等. 无机化学学报, 2009, 35(11), 1960.
21 Cai F, Lu P, Ibrahim J J, et al. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(23), 11717.
22 Li H, Tian H, Chen S, et al. Applied Catalysis B:Environmental, 2020, 276, 119052.
23 Bossola F, Scotti N, Somodi F, et al. Applied Catalysis B:Environmental, 2019, 258, 118016.
24 Yang H M, Chan M K. Catalysis Communications, 2011, 12(15), 1389.
25 Mamivand S, Binazadeh M, Sohrabi R. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2021, 104, 212.
26 Amiri T Y, Ghasemzageh K, Iulianelli A. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 2020, 157, 108148.
27 Shifa T A, Vomiero A. Advanced Energy Materials, 2019, 9(40), 1902307.
28 Cuadrado-Collados C, Majid A A A, Martínez-Escandell M, et al. Carbon, 2020, 158, 346.
29 Xu M, Lai C, Liu X, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2021, 9, 24148.
30 Talaghat M R, Naamaki N. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(2), 2282.
31 Tampaxis C, Steriotis T A, Katsaros F K, et al. Journal of Surface Investigation:X-ray, Synchrotron and Neutron Techniques, 2020, 14, S221.
32 Wu L, Ni B, Chen R, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2020, 8, 21026.
33 Zhang B, Zhao D, Wu Y, et al. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(2), 623.
34 Purnama H, Ressler T, Jentoft R E, et al. Applied Catalysis A:General, 2004, 259(1), 83.
35 Valdés-Solís T, Marbán G, Fuertes A B. Catalysis Today, 2006, 116(3), 354.