M390高碳马氏体不锈钢与304奥氏体不锈钢CMT对接焊连接机理

doi:10.11896/cldb.21090294

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (28217KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract M390 powder metallurgy high carbon martensitic stainless steel and 304 austenitic stainless steel are joined by cold metal transfer (CMT) butt welding experiments with ERNi-1 nickel-based metal as filler wire. The mechanical properties and microstructure of the welded joint were characterized by tensile experiment, vickers microhardness test, scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). The grain size and carbide distribution in different areas on M390 side were measured to reveal the joining mechanism of the welded joint. The results show that: M390 high carbon martensitic stainless steel and 304 austenitic stainless steel CMT butt welding joints with no holes, no inclusions and other defects could be achieved. The best welding process parameters were welding speed of 4.5 mm/s, wire feeding speed of 9 m/min, welding current of 110 A, welding voltage of 18.1 V, the corresponding tensile strength and the elongation reached 493 MPa and 21.8%, respectively. Its plasticity was much higher than M390 base metal. The fracture location appeared at the weld metal position. Ductile fracture dominated the fracture surfaces. The weld metal is composed of austenite microstructure and (Ti, Ni, Al) carbides. Metallurgical bon-ding can be achieved between weld metal and M390. An obvious fusion line appears in 304 fusion zone. Because M390 heat-affected zone is affected by heat input and welding residual stress, the residual austenite in the matrix of M390 heat-affected zone is induced to undergo a martensitic transformation, which lead to the supersaturation of carbon in the matrix of M390 heat-affected zone. The precipitated carbon not only increases the number of carbides, but also promotes the type of carbides to change from M₂₃C₆ to M₇C₃. The size of carbide in M390 coarse-grained heat affected zone is the largest, showing a strip shaped morphology. The size of carbide in M390 fine-grained heat affected zone is located between M390 base metal and M390 coarse-grained heat affected zone, showing two morphology of strip shape and granular shape. The grain size of M390 high-carbon martensitic stainless heat-affected zone is significantly smaller than martensitic steel heat-affected zone by traditional fusion welding, which can reflect CMT improvement on the coarsening of M390 high-carbon martensitic stainless steel heat-affected zone.

Key words： M390 high carbon martensitic stainless steel CMT microstructure mechanical property carbide

Published: 10 April 2023 Online: 2023-04-07

CLC number:

TG406

Fund:National Natural Science Foundation of China(52175325,51961024,52071170).

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	QIAO Lixue
	CAO Rui
	CHE Hongyan
	LI Shang
	WANG Tiejun
	DONG Hao
	WANG Caiqin
	YAN Yingjie

Cite this article:

QIAO Lixue,CAO Rui,CHE Hongyan, et al. CMT Butt Welding Mechanism of M390 Martensitic Stainless Steel and 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel[J]. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(7): 21090294-6.

URL:

http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.21090294 OR http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2023/V37/I7/21090294

1 Wang T J, Yang B, Liang C, et al. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(12), 12122 (in Chinese).
王铁军, 杨博, 梁晨, 等. 材料导报, 2020, 34(12), 12122.
2 Sharifitabar M, Halvaee A. Materials and Design, 2010, 31(6), 3044.
3 Zhang P. Materials Reports, 2013, 27(Z2), 331 (in Chinese).
张平. 材料导报, 2013, 27(Z2), 331.
4 Pandia R S, Senthil K S, Kumaraswamidhas L A. Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design Systems and Manufacturing, 2015, 9(3), 0045.
5 Li F G, Lei Y C, Li T Q, et al. Materials Reports, 2020, 34(4), 4098 (in Chinese).
李福贵, 雷玉成, 李天庆, 等. 材料导报, 2020, 34(4), 4098.
6 Kumar M, Srinivasan P B. Materials Letters, 2008, 62(17-18), 2887.
7 Berretta J R, Rossi W D, Neves M D M D, et al. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2007, 45(9), 960.
8 Srinivasan P B, Sharkawy S W, Dietzel W. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2004, 13(2), 232.
9 Erdem M, Altu M, Karabulut M. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 85, 481.
10 Baghjari S H, Akbarimousavi S. Materials and Design, 2014, 57, 128.
11 Zhang Z K, Liu X F, Li Z, et al. Materials Reports, 2021, 35(24), 24128 (in Chinese).
张忠科, 刘旭峰, 李昭, 等. 材料导报, 2021, 35(24), 24128.
12 Yang X R. Electric Welding Machine, 2006, 36, 5.
13 Cao R, Sun J H, Chen J H. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 2013, 18(5), 425.
14 Jing S, Wang K, Qi Z, et al. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 2013, 42(7), 1337.
15 Fortain J M, Bonnefois B. Welding International, 2004, 18(3), 202.
16 Mahajan S, Chhibber R. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 2020, 35(9), 1010.
17 Sun Z, Moisio T. Metal Science Journal, 1993, 9(7), 603.
18 Buntain R, Alexandrov B, Viswanathan G. Materials Characterization, 2020, 170(9), 110638.
19 Dak G, Pandey C. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2021, 194, 104536.
20 Qin B, Qi Y C, Cao J C, et al. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2017, 42(5), 7 (in Chinese).
秦斌, 齐彦昌, 曹建春, 等. 金属热处理, 2017, 42(5), 7.
21 Li K J, Li X G, Zhang Y, et al. Electric Welding Machine, 2020, 50(9), 17 (in Chinese).
李克俭, 李晓刚, 张宇, 等. 电焊机, 2020, 50(9), 17.
22 Gitts M, Gooch T. Carbon, 1992, 12, 461.
23 Tang Z X, Yan F, Liu J P. Foundry Technology, 2017, 38(7), 4 (in Chinese).
汤振兴, 闫芳, 刘继鹏. 铸造技术, 2017, 38(7), 4.