金属液测速技术的原理及研究进展

doi:10.11896/cldb.21020076

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (4)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (19157KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Flow is a very common phenomenon in nature and engineering fields, and measurement and control of flow have always been essential goals. Liquid metal flow is indispensable in the metallurgical industry, and its flow behavior and transport process involve multiple processing links, including use of blast furnaces, ladles and molds, all of which significantly impact both production efficiency and product quality. In material processes such as continuous casting, continuous hot galvanisation, and secondary aluminium production, the speed,direction and changing law of molten metal flow is of great important for adjusting process parameters and controlling product quality. However, in the face of opaqueness, high temperature, and chemically aggressive molten metal fluids, accurately measuring the flow velocity yield poses a challenge for researchers and engineers. In the past 20 years, with the advancement of electromagnetic technology, great progress has been achieved in velocity measurement techniques for molten metal, and real-time online noncontact measurement of multiphase three-dimensional turbulence has gradually been realised. The application of velocity measurement technology has gradually been extended to fields such as crystal growth, electrochemistry, the nuclear industry and medicine. There are the wide variety of molten metal velocity measurement methods, and each method has its own advantages and disadvantages. In this paper, we introduce the principles, application scenarios and research progress of several molten metal velocity measurement methods commonly used in industry, analyse the differences among different methods and their respective advantages and disadvantages, and discuss prospects for their future development.

Key words： metal fluid flow measurement continuous casting contact measurement method non-contact measurement method

Published: 25 February 2023 Online: 2023-03-02

CLC number:

TB126

Fund:Local Scientific and Technological Development Funds Guided by the Central Government in 2021(GuiKe ZY21195030),Guangxi Science and Technology Base and Talent Project in 2022(GuiKe AD21238010),and Guangxi Key Laboratory of Processing for Non-ferrous Metals and Featured Materials(2021GXMPSF02).

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Chang
	LI Anmin
	WANG Xiaodong

Cite this article:

WANG Chang,LI Anmin,WANG Xiaodong. Principles and Research Progress of Metal Fluid Velocimetry Techniques[J]. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(4): 21020076-7.

URL:

http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.21020076 OR http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2023/V37/I4/21020076

1 Jin G, Jiao J J, Wu X. Mining & Processing Equipment, 2015, 43(12), 10 (in Chinese).
金光, 焦晶晶, 吴晅. 矿山机械, 2015, 43(12), 10.
2 Rutkevich I M. Fluid Dynamics, 1981, 16(3), 414.
3 Iguchi M, Takeuchi M, Kawabata H, et al. Materials Transactions, JIM, 1994, 35(10), 716.
4 Mikrovas A C, Argyropoulos S A. Metallurgical & Materials Transactions B, 1993, 24(6), 1009.
5 Lee H C, Evans J W, Vives C. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 1984, 15(4), 734.
6 Iguchi M, Kawabata H, Morita Z. High Temperature Materials & Processes, 2000, 19(3-4), 187.
7 Iguchi M, Kosaka H, Hayashi A, et al. Metallurgical & Materials Tran-sactions B, 1999, 30(1), 53.
8 Iguchi M, Terauchi Y. ISIJ International, 2002, 42(9), 939.
9 Iguchi M, Kawabata H, Ogura T, et al. ISIJ International, 1996, 36(1), 190.
10 Mizukami H, Hanao M, Hiraki S, et al. Tetsu-to-Hagane, 2000, 86(4), 265.
11 Poornapushpakala S, Gomathy C, Sylvia J I, et al. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2014, 38, 98.
12 Sureshkumar S, Sabih M, Narmadha S, et al. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2013, 265, 1223.
13 Kumar M, Tordjeman P, Bergez W, et al. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2015, 86(10), 106104.
14 Guichou R, Ayroles H, Zamansky R, et al. Journal of Applied Physics, 2019, 125(9), 94504.
15 Kumar M, Tordjeman P, Bergez W, et al. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2016, 1, 1.
16 Krauter N, Galindo V, Wondrak T, et al. Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science, 2021. 86(10), 106104.
17 Forbriger J, Stefani F. Measurement Science & Technology, 2015, 26(10), 105303.
18 Looney R, Priede J. Flow Meas Urement Instrum, 2017, 1705, 02939.
19 Krauter N, Stefani F. Measurement Science & Technology, 2017, 28(10), 105301.
20 Krauter N, Stefani F. Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 424(1), 12004.
21 Eckert S, Gerbeth G. Experiments in Fluids, 2002, 32(5), 542.
22 Jaafar W, Fischer S, Bekkour K. Measurement, 2009, 42(2), 175.
23 Eckert S, Gerbeth G, Melnikov V I. Experiments in Fluids, 2003, 35(5), 381.
24 Cramer A, Zhang C, Eckert S. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2004, 15(3), 145.
25 Eckert S, Gerbeth G, Melnikov V I. Experiments in Fluids, 2003, 35(5), 381.
26 Eckert S, Buchenau D, Gerbeth G, et al. Journal of Nuclear Science & Technology, 2011, 48(4), 490.
27 Perez A, Kelley D H. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2015, 102, 52622.
28 Gates P E, Gurung A, Mazzaro L, et al. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2018, 44(7), 1392.
29 Ratajczak M, Gundrum T, Stefani F, et al. Journal of Sensors, 2014, 2014, 1.
30 Stefani F, Gundrum T, Gerbeth G. Physical Review E, 2004, 70, 56306.
31 Ratajczak M, Wondrak T, Timmel K, et al. Journal for Manufacturing Science and Production, 2015, 15(1), 41.
32 Wondrak T, Galindo V, Gerbeth G, et al. Measurement Science & Technology, 2010, 21(4), 45402.
33 Wondrak T, Eckert S, Gerbeth G, et al. Steel Research International, 2014, 85(8), 1266.
34 Wondrak T, Pal J, Stefani F, et al. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2017, 62, 269.
35 Wondrak T, Stefani F, Galindo V, et al. Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 424(1), 12007.
36 Wondrak T, Galindo V, Stefani F, et al. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 2019, 59(4), 1291.
37 Ratajczak M, Wondrak T, Stefani F. Philosophical Transactions A , 2016, 374, 2070.
38 Davidson P A. An introduction to magnetohydrodynamics, Cambridge University Press, UK, 2001.
39 Thess A, Votyakov E V, Kolesnikov Y. Physical Review Letters, 2006, 96(16), 164501.
40 Halbedel B, Resagk C, Thess A, et al. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2014, 92(1), 361.
41 Werner M, Halbedel B. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2012, 48(11), 2925.
42 Vasilyan S, Ebert R, Weidner M, et al. Measurement Science & Technology, 2015, 26(11), 115302.
43 Vakaliuk O V, Ainslie M D, Halbedel B. Superconductor Science & Technology, 2018, 31(8), 84003.
44 Viré A, Knaepen B, Thess A. Physics of Fluids (1994), 2010, 22(12), 125101.
45 Jian D, Karcher C. Measurement Science & Technology, 2012, 23(7), 894.
46 Kolesnikov Y, Karcher C, Thess A. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science, 2011, 42(3), 441.
47 Zheng J C, Liu R C, Wang X D. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2020, 56(7), 3 (in Chinese).
郑锦灿, 刘润聪, 王晓东. 金属学报, 2020, 56(7), 3.
48 Wang X D, Thess A, Moreau R, et al. Journal of Applied Physics, 2016, 120(1), 188.
49 Wang B, Wang X D. Measurement Science & Technology, 2018, 29(12), 125601.
50 Tan Y Q, Liu R C, Dai S J, et al. Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2018, 29(6), 80.
51 Kolesnikov Y, Karcher C, Thess A. Metallurgical and materials transactions B, Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science, 2011, 42(3), 441.
52 Carmen Stelian. Flow Measurement & Instrumentation, 2013, 33, 36.
53 Wang X D, Kolesnikov Y, Thess A. Measurement Science and Technology, 2012, 23(4), 45005.