INORGANIC MATERIALS AND CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES |
|
|
|
|
|
The Simulation and Analysis of Dehydration Process of FGD Gypsum Grouted Wall |
ZENG Ziyue1,2, YANG Jiansen1, WEI Yongqi2
|
1 School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, China 2 School of Material Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China |
|
|
Abstract In this work, the physical dehydration process of multi-scale flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum core grouted wall was simulated by using the rare material transfer model in the porous media flow module with COMSOL software and relative theories of material transfer. The simulation was verified by the FGD gypsum core grouted wall dehydration test.The influencing factors of the dehydration of the FGD gypsum core grouted wall, the spatial distribution of free water, and other characteristics in the process of FGD gypsum dehydration were analyzed by controlling model parameters. The results showed that the simulation results were consistent with the experimental results. The dehydration time of 40 mm FGD gypsum under the three relative humidity conditions of 55%, 75% and 82% at 20℃ was about 350 h, 450 h and 500 h, respectively. The lower the relative humidity was, the longer the dehydration time of FGD gypsum was and the greater the influence on the final mass loss rate was, but the influence on the final mass loss rate was small, and the final mass loss rate was about -21%. When the relative humidity was 75%, the dehydration time of 40 mm FGD gypsum at 0 ℃, 10 ℃ and 20 ℃ was about 650 h, 500 h and 450 h, respectively. The rise of temperature accele-rates the dehydration rate and shortens the dehydration time, but it has almost no effect on the final mass loss rate, which always keeps at about -21%. When the temperature was 20 ℃ and the relative humidity was 75%, the mass loss rate of FGD gypsum of 40 mm, 90 mm and 140 mm thickness at 450 h was about -21%, -10% and -5%, respectively, indicating that the thickness significantly increased the dehydration time of FGD gypsum. FGD gypsum dehydration process and the change of concentration of free water filling and grouted wall was from outside to inside. The change of concentration of free water produced concentration gradient belt which moves from outside to inside over time with width gradually widening. When FGD gypsum dehydration was completed, the internal free water concentrations were low, which were 0—0.2×104 mol/m3.
|
Published: 10 March 2022
Online: 2022-03-08
|
|
Fund:National Natural Science Foundation of China (51568056) and First-Class Discipline Construction of Universities in Ningxia (NXYLXK2021A03). |
|
|
1 Liu Y X, Zhang C M, Zhao J, et al. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2018, 37(8),2583.
刘云霄, 张春苗, 赵洁, 等. 硅酸盐通报, 2018, 37(8), 2583.
2 Yang L. Study on Preparation and properties of modified flue gas desulfurization building gypsum composite walling materials. Master’s Thesis, Shandong Jianzhu University, China, 2017(in Chinese).
杨磊.改性烟气脱硫建筑石膏复合墙材的研制及性能研究.硕士学位论文,山东建筑大学,2017.
3 Schuette H W, Hune R N. US patent, US3529357DA, 1970.
4 Chester R N, Alfred D. US patent, US4050885, 1977.
5 Feng X J, Li F. Drying Technology & Equipment, 2012, 10(4), 40.
冯小江, 李帆. 干燥技术与设备, 2012, 10(4), 40.
6 Ni H, Datta A K, Torrance K E. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 1999, 42(8), 1501.
7 Başağaoğlu H, Meakin P, Succi S, et al. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 2006, 73(6), 858.
8 Kao P H, Ren T F, Yang R J. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2007, 50(21-22), 4243.
9 Huber C, Chopard B, Manga M. Journal of Computational Physics, 2010, 229(20), 7956.
10 Han W. Simulation of curing drying temperature of gypsum wallboard and study of influencing factors based on ANSYS. Master’s Thesis, Zhongnan University, China, 2007(in Chinese).
韩玮.基于ANSYS石膏墙板养护干燥温度仿真及影响因素研究.硕士学位论文,中南大学,2007.
11 Mo J S, Yang Y Y, Sheng H Q, et al. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(11), 4440.
莫建松, 杨有余, 盛海强, 等. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(11), 4440.
12 Ding Y, Wei Y Q, Wang Z P, et al. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2019, 38(5), 1491.
丁杨, 魏永起, 王中平, 等. 硅酸盐通报, 2019, 38(5), 1491.
13 Ding Y, Wei Y Q, Zhou S X. New Building Materials, 2017, 44(6), 70.
丁杨, 魏永起, 周双喜. 新型建筑材料, 2017, 44(6), 70.
14 Lentzou D, Boudouvis A G, Karathanos V T, et al. Journal of Food Engineering, 2019, 263, 299.
15 Defraeye T, Verboven P. Journal of Food Engineering, 2017, 193, 95.
16 Purlis E. Journal of Food Engineering, 2019, 263,132.
17 Liu Q, Suo L M. System Simulation Technology, 2019, 15(3),184.
柳崎, 索丽敏. 系统仿真技术, 2019, 15(3), 184.
18 Zhou F, Liu Q Y, Wang C G, et al. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2019, 40(6),1677.
周峰, 刘琪英, 王晨光, 等. 太阳能学报, 2019, 40(6),1677.
19 Liu Y, Huang T. Journal of Hubei University of Technology, 2018, 33(4), 113.
刘洋, 黄涛. 湖北工业大学学报, 2018, 33(4),113.
20 China National Bureau of Statistics. China statistical yearbook, China Statistics Press, 2020(in Chinese).
中华人民共和国统计局. 中国统计年鉴, 中国统计出版社, 2020.
21 Lu Y Q. Study on the characteristics of coupled heat air and moisture transfer in building walls in cold aera. Master’s Thesis, China University of Mining and Technology, China, 2020(in Chinese).
卢阳巧.寒冷地区建筑墙体热湿及空气渗透耦合传递特性研究.硕士学位论文,中国矿业大学,2020.
22 Zhu G H, Gao X G, Li K, et al. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2010, 41(5), 1828.
朱桂华, 高旭光, 李抗, 等. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 41(5), 1828.
23 Liu G P. Friend of Science Amateurs, 2013(11),97(in Chinese).
刘贵平. 科学之友, 2013(11), 97.
24 Datta A K. Journal of Food Engineering, 2007, 80(1), 96.
25 Datta A K. Journal of Food Engineering, 2007, 80(1), 80.
26 Halder A, Dhall A, Datta A K. Journal of Heat Transfer, 2011, 133(3),031010. |
|
|
|