重金属氧化物玻璃X/γ射线屏蔽性能评价方法探讨

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (4807KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In the utilization of nuclear energy and technology, shielding the radiation threat is an important means to control the dose at the site and protect the health of personnel. At present, the main shielding materials include concrete, lead and other alloys and composite materials; Heavy metal oxide glass has both good shielding performance and light transmittance, which is favored in many shielding applications. In recent years, due to the diversity of glass composition types, a large number of new glass development and shielding performance research work have been carried out to further tap its application value. In this paper, the research reports on X/γ ray shielding performance of various heavy metal oxide glasses at home and abroad are combed. Focusing on the acquisition of mass attenuation coefficient parameters, the basic methods, main conclusions, experimental conditions and errors in theoretical calculation, Monte Carlo simulation and experimental measurement are summarized. The common shielding performance characte-ristics and laws of heavy metal oxide glasses are summarized from the perspective of mechanism and data comparison, and the advantages and disadvantages of the three methods and their application value in the actual design and development of glasses are compared. Based on the research literatures of various new shielding glasses, this work discusses and summarizes the reference points and shortcomings in the existing research work, and gives a more comprehensive research idea of X/γ-ray shielding performance of heavy metal oxide glasses, which can provide a meaningful reference for subsequent research.

Key words： radiation shielding material heavy metal oxide glass mass attenuation coefficient Monte Carlo

Published: 09 December 2021

CLC number:

O48 O571 O61

About author:: Yi Sun graduated from Harbin University of Science and Technology with a major in Measurement and Control Technology and Instrument in 2011. He is the engineer of Radiation Protection of the CNNC Nuclear Power Operation Management Co., Ltd.
Guodong Li obtained his M.S. degree from Fudan University and served in China Institute for Radiation Protection till now. He is currently an assistant research fellow, and his study focuses on radiation protection.

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	SUN Yi
	LI Menghan
	WANG Chao
	HAN Yi
	LI Guodong

Cite this article:

SUN Yi,LI Menghan,WANG Chao, et al. Discussion on Evaluation of X/γ Ray Shielding Performance for Heavy Metal Oxide Glass[J]. Materials Reports, 2021, 35(z2): 101-106.

URL:

http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/ OR http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2021/V35/Iz2/101

1 Kok B, Benli H. Renewable Energy, 2017, 111, 870.
2 Akleyev A V.Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 2016, 171(1), 107.
3 韩毅, 陈法国, 于伟跃,等. 材料导报, 2015(S2),483.
4 Al-Humaiqani M M, Shuraim A B, Hussain R R. Asian Transactions on Engineering, 2013, 3(2),18.
5 McCaffery J P, Shen H, Downton B, et al.Medical Physics, 2007, 34(2),530.
6 Obaid S S, Gaikwad D K, Pawar P P. Radiation physics and chemistry,2018, 144, 356–360.
7 沈华亚, 陈法国, 韩毅,等. 材料导报, 2019, 33(S02),484.
8 Intom S, Kalkornsurapranee E, Johns J, et al. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 2020, 172, 108772.
9 Oto B, Kavaz E, Durak H, et al. Ceramics International, 2019, 45(17),23681.
10 Sayyed M I, Elhouichet H. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 2017, 130, 335.
11 El-Kameesy S Y, El-Ghany S A, Azooz M A E, et al. World Journal of Condensed Matter Physics, 2013, 3(4), 198.
12 Ahmed M R, Ashok B, Ahmmad S K, et al. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2019, 210, 308.
13 Mariyappan M, Marimuthu K, Sayyed M I, et al. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 2018, 499,75.
14 Singh N, Singh K J, Singh K, et al. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 2004, 225(3), 305.
15 https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/XrayMassCoef/chap2.html
16 Gerward L, Guilbert N, Jensen K B, et al. Radiation Physics and Chemi-stry, 2004, 71(3-4), 653.
17 Mann N, Kaur U, Singh T, et al. American Institute of Physics, 2010, 1324(1), 407.
18 Nowotny R. https://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=c57e0f73e30431e17d5060f55e2c0835&site=xueshu_se.
19 Şakar E, Özpolat Ö F, Al¹m B, et al. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 2020,166,108496.
20 Alhammashi M A R, ALattabi H D, Aldhuhaibat M J R. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,2020, 928(7),072077.
21 Al-Hadeethi Y, Sayyed M I.Ceramics International, 2019, 45(18),24858.
22 Al-Buriahi M S, Tonguç B, Perişanoğlu U, et al. Ceramics International, 2020, 46(15),23347.
23 Creagh D C, Hubbell J H. Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations of Crystallography, 1987, 43(1), 102.
24 Susoy G, Guclu E E A, Kilicoglu O, et al. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2020, 242, 122481.
25 Dong M G, Agar O, Tekin H O, et al. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 165, 636.
26 Issa S A M, Mostafa A M A. Journal of Alloys & Compounds, 2017, 695,302.
27 Aee A, Mb B, Mee A, et al.Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2018, 104,280.
28 Kaky K M, Sayyed M I, Khammas A, et al. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2019, 242,122504.
29 Kaewjang S, Maghanemi U, Kothan S, et al.Nuclear Engineering & Design, 2014, 280,21.
30 Shamshad L, Rooh G, Limkitjaroenporn P, et al.Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2017, 97,53.
31 El-Khayatt A M, Ali A M, Singh V P. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, 2014, 735,207.
32 Kurudirek M.Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017, 727, 1227.
33 Ruengsri S.Science & Technology of Nuclear Installations, 2014, 2014,1.