Materials Reports 2021, Vol. 35 Issue (z2): 13-17 |
INORGANIC MATERIALS AND CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES |
|
|
|
|
|
Preparation and Fluorescent Properties of Molybdenum Disulfide Quantum Dots With High Fluorescence Quantum Yield |
WEI Yiling1,2, DENG Wenjiang1,2,JIN Caihong1,2, LI Hui1,2,WANG Chuanming1,2,MENG Tiehong1,2, ZHANG Wenjuan3, ZHAO Hongbin1,2, SHUAI Guangping1,2, YANG Zhengmin1,2, LI Chunrong1,2, HU Xianyun1,2,3,4
|
1 Qiannan Medical College for Nationalities,Duyun 558000, China 2 The Collaborative Innovation Center of Qiannan State for Ethnic and Nano Medicine, Duyun 558000, China 3 Affiliated Hospital of Qiannan Medical for Nationalities, Duyun 558000, China 4 The Key Laboratory of Chemistry for Natural Products of Guizhou Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences,Guiyang 550014, China |
|
|
Abstract Molybdenum disulfide quantum dots (MoS2 QDs) have excellent physical and chemical properties, which have potential great applications in catalysis, fluorescent imaging, fluorescent sensing and biological imaging, etc. However, its preparation methods and quantum yield still need further improvement. In this paper, MoS2 QDs were prepared by using sodium molybdate as molybdenum source and glutathione as sulfur source by one pot “bottom-up” hydrothermal approach, and its fluorescent intensity was used as the monitoring index. The single factor analysis was adopted to optimize the proportion of molybdenum and sulfur source, pH value, reaction time and reaction temperature.The results showed that the best molybdenum and sulfur source ratio was 1∶3.5, the best pH value was between 4-8, the best reaction time was 30 h, the best reaction temperature was 210 ℃. The reaction conditions were also optimized by orthogonal experiment, the optimum reaction conditions was that reaction time was 30 h, reaction temperature was 220 ℃, molybdenum and sulfur source ratio was 1∶3.5, pH value was 3, the best fluorescent quantum yield of MoS2 QDs was about 21%. The MoS2 QDs had mono- disperse, those particle size was (4.0 ± 0.35) nm, and being rich in a mino and carboxyl functional groups. Its UV absorption peak was 336 nm, FL emission wavelength was 424 nm, and full width at half maxima was 79 nm. It can lay a foundation for the highly sensitive ion and biomolecular detection of MoS2 QDs and low toxicity cell imaging.
|
Published: 09 December 2021
|
|
Fund:This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81860317), Guizhou Province Natural Science Foundation (qkhb 〔2019〕2821, qkhj 〔2016〕1136, qkhj 〔2019〕1301), Qiannan Science and Technology Plan Project (qnhz 〔2016〕12, qnhz 〔2014〕8),Joint Fund of Guizhou Provincial Department of Health and School (gzwkj2012-2-017) and Qiannan National Medical College Scientific Research Fund (qnyz201947, qnyz201921, qnyz201801, qnyz201807, qnyz201843). |
About author:: Yiling Wei, master, lecturer, master's degree in Fujian Normal University in 2019, mainly engaged in cell bio-logy, cellular signaling pathway, biologically active substances. Xianyun Hu, Ph.D, professor, doctoral degree in Southeast University in 2018, mainly engaged in natio-nal medicinal nano medicine, nanomaterial research. Wenjiang Deng,mainly studies new fluorescent quantum dots, drug metabolism in vivo,extraction, separation, detection of compounds. Caihong Jin,mainly studies drug detection, fluorescent quantum dots, tea process optimization, compound composition and so on. These authors contributed equally to this work. |
|
|
1 Wang H T, Lu Z Y, Xu S C, et al. PNAS,2013,110(49), 19701. 2 Stephenson T, Li Z, Olsen B, et al. Energy & Environmental Science, 2014, 7(1), 209. 3 Dai W H, Dong H F, Fugetsu B, et al. Small, 2015, 11(33), 4158. 4 Jaramillo T F, Jorgensen K P, Bonde J, et al. Science, 2007, 317(5834), 100. 5 Wi S J, Kim H S, Chen M K, et al. ACS Nano, 2014, 8(5), 5270. 6 Tang H J, Wang J Y, Yin H J, et al. Advanced Materials, 2015,27(6), 1117. 7 Rao C N R, Matte H S S, Maitra U. Angemandte Chemie International Edition, 2013, 52(50), 13162. 8 Huang X, Zeng Z Y, Zhang H M,et al. Chemical Society Reviews, 2013, 42(5),1934. 9 Jia J Y, Jeon S, Jeon J, et al. Small, 2018 14(9), 1703065. 10 姜相宇, 付华, 张敏, 等. 分析化学. 2018, 46(7), 1077. 11 李菁菁, 郁莉婷, 万法广, 等.化学试剂,2018, 40(12), 1. 12 Zhang X, Lai Z C, Liu Z D, et al. Angemandte Chemie International Edition, 2015, 54(18), 5425. 13 Stengl V, Henych J. Nanoscale,2013, 5(8), 3387. 14 Deepesh G, Dijo D, Manikoth M. ACS Nano, 2014, 8(5), 5297. 15 Mukhcrjee S, Maiti R, Katiyar A K, et al. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6, 29016. 16 Li H, Wu J, Yin Z, Zhang H. Accounts of Chemical Researth, 2014, 47(4), 1067. 17 Qiao W, Yan S M, Song X Y, et al. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 35(9), 130. 18 Gu W, Yan Y H, Cao X N, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2016, 4(1), 27. 19 Gao W Y, Wang M Q, Ran C X, et al. Chenical Commuaications, 2015,51(9), 1709. 20 Rren X P, Pang L Q, Zhang Y X, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015, 3(20): 10693. 21 Yu W L, Zhou J J, Zhang Y Q, et al. Nanoscale ,2016, 8(5), 2720. 22 Zhao X, He D W, Wang Y S, et al. Chinese Physics B, 2017, 26(6), 066102. 23 Niu Y, Jiao W C, Wang R G, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2016, 4(21), 8198. 24 Gan Z X, Gui Q F, Shan Y, et al. Journal of Applied Physics, 2016, 120(10), 104503. 25 Chen J, Li Y, Lv K, et al. Sensors and Actuators B Chemical,2016, 22(4), 298. 26 Lv Z, Mahmood N, Tahir M, et al. Nanoscale, 2016, 8(43), 18250. 27 Hariharan S, Karthikeyan B. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(104), 101770. 28 Gu W, Yan Y H, Zhang C L, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(18), 11272. 29 Zhang S, Jia X, Wang E. Nanoscale, 2016, 8(33), 15152. 30 Kukkar M, Singh S, Kumar N, et al. Microchimica Acta, 2017,184(12), 4647. 31 Zhou K, Zhang Y, Xia Z N, et al. Nanotechnology, 2016, 27(27), 275101. 32 Wang J P, Tan X X, Pang X J, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8 (37), 24331. 33 Ma J, Yu H H, Jiang X, et al. Sensors and Actuators B Chem, 2019, 28(1), 989. 34 Wang Y, Ni Y N. Analytical Chemistry, 2014, 86(15), 7463. |
|
|
|