全固态锂硫电池中界面问题的研究现状

doi:10.11896/cldb.20050229

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download:

Full Text ( PDF ) (9915KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Due to the high theoretical specific capacity of lithium metal anodes and the high safety of solid electrolytes, all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batte-ries (SSLSBs) are increasingly favored by researchers. Compared with liquid lithium-sulfur batteries, the biggest difference of SSLSBs is that the solid electrolyte replaces the liquid electrolyte. The solid electrolyte material is of high safty because of non-flammable of solid electrolyte. In addition, the optimized solid electrolyte exhibits sufficient mechanical strength to effectively suppress the generation of lithium dendrites. SSLSBs also have greater advantages in terms of product preparation and transportation.
However, the high density solid-solid interfaces in SSLSBs may induce a series of problems such as interface resistance and volume distortion during cycling, which restricts the commercial application of SSLSBs. Thus, researchers have conducted extensive research on the solid-solid interfaces in recent years, including continuously improving the preparation process, characterizing the interface evolution process, and simulating and verifying the ion migration path. At present, some SSLSBs have realized commercial application.
SSLSBs mainly include sulfur-containing positive electrodes, lithium metal negative electrodes and solid electrolytes. Solid electrolytes are mainly divided into electrodeless solid electrolytes and organic solid electrolytes. Therefore, the researches on the interface of solid electrolyte can also be categorized in two types. One type is the internal interface of solid electrolyte, including the interface between inorganic electrolyte and inor-ganic electrolyte or the interface between inorganic and organic electrolyte. Another type mainly includes the interface between the solid electrolyte and the electrodes, which has a great influence on the chemical stability, volume stability and electronic ion conductivity of the battery. In recent years, researchers have found that the interface can be effectively improved via changing the mixing method, particle size, porous matrix and volumetric pressure. Besides, with the development of characterization technology, more and more in-situ interface characterization technologies provide more intuitively changing state of the interface.
This article systematically summarizes the problems and research status of the internal and external interfaces of SSLSBs, and discusses the future development trends and research priorities of SSLSBs.

Key words： all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries solid-solid interface solid electrolyte electrochemical performance

Published: 31 May 2021

CLC number:

TM911

Fund:National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFB0703103), National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (51701052) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M620114).

About author:: Zhenggang Jia received his B.S. Degree in applied chemistry from Harbin Institute of Technology for the Nationalities in 2016. He is currently pursuing her Ph.D. at the School of Materials, Harbin Institute of Technology under the supervision of Prof. Xuexi Zhang and Yueping Xiong. His research has focused on interfacial behavior in sulfide all-solid-state batteries.
Xuexi Zhang is a full professor in Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT). He got his PhD from HIT in 2003. His research interests include energy materials and structural materials for aerospace application. He has published over 100 papers. He also co-authored over 40 patents.
Yueping Xiong, professor and doctoral supervisor of Harbin Institute of Technology. As the main participant, he has completed 6 major scientific research topics such as NEDO, focusing on the research of SOFC durability. In addition, he has undertook the performance degradation experiment of single cell performance such as Ni/YSZ anode carbon deposition sulfur poisoning and cat-hode sulfur poisoning chromium poisoning. He has personally experienced the industrialization process of SOFC in Japan, and he is familiar with the research progress in this field at home and abroad.

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	JIA Zhenggang
	ZHANG Xuexi
	QIAN Mingfang
	GENG Lin
	XIONG Yueping

Cite this article:

JIA Zhenggang,ZHANG Xuexi,QIAN Mingfang, et al. Interface-related Issues in the Research of All-Solid-State Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: a Review[J]. Materials Reports, 2021, 35(9): 9097-9107.

URL:

http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/10.11896/cldb.20050229 OR http://www.mater-rep.com/EN/Y2021/V35/I9/9097

1 Tarascon J M, Armand M. Nature,2001,414,359.
2 Armand M, Tarascon J M. Nature,2008,451,652.
3 Wang Q, Ping P, Zhao X, et al. Journal of Power Sources,2012,208,210.
4 Cheng X B, Zhang R, Zhao C Z, et al. Chemical Reviews,2017,117,10403.
5 Xu W, Wang J, Ding F, et al. Energy & Environmental Science,2014,7,513.
6 Hu Y S. Nature Energy,2016,1,16042.
7 Janek J, Zeier W G. Nature Energy,2016,1,16141.
8 Lin Z, Liang C D. Journal of Materials Chemistry A,2015,3,936.
9 Wang Z, Shen J, Liu J, et al. Advanced Materials,2019,31,1970236.
10 Shen J, Xu X, Liu J, et al. ACS Nano,2019,13,8986.
11 Lin Z, Liu Z, Dudney N J, et al. ACS Nano,2013,7,2829.
12 Fu K, Gong Y, Dai J, et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2016,113,7094.
13 Wang Z, Shen J, Ji S, et al. Small,2020,16,1906634.
14 Yang X, Luo J, Sun X. Chemical Society Reviews,2020,49,2140.
15 Pang Q, Nazar L F. ACS Nano,2016,10,4111.
16 Lu S, Cheng Y, Wu X, et al. Nano Letters,2013,13,2485.
17 Moon S, Jung Y H, Jung W K, et al. Advanced Materials,2013,25,6547.
18 Chung S H, Chang C H, Manthiram A. ACS Nano,2016,10,10462.
19 Yang X, Zhang H, Chen Y, et al. Nano Energy,2017,39,418.
20 Dixit M B, Zaman W, Hortance N, et al. Joule,2020,4,207.
21 Randau S, Weber D A, Koetz O, et al. Nature Energy,2020,5,259.
22 Rangasamy E, Sahu G, Keum J K, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A,2014,2,4111.
23 Hood Z D, Wang H, Li Y, et al. Solid State Ionics,2015,283,75.
24 Sakuda A, Kuratani K, Yamamoto M, et al. Journal of the Electrochemical Society,2017,164,A2474.
25 Zhu Y Z, He X F, Mo Y F. Journal of Materials Chemistry A,2016,4,3253.
26 Keller M, Appetecchi G B, Kim G T, et al. Journal of Power Sources,2017,353,287.
27 Choi J H, Lee C H, Yu J H, et al. Journal of Power Sources,2015,274,458.
28 Langer F, Bardenhagen I, Glenneberg J, et al. Solid State Ionics,2016,291,8.
29 Fu K, Gong Y, Dai J, et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2016,113,7094.
30 Zheng J, Tang M X, Hu Y Y. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition,2016,55,12538.
31 Chen L, Li Y, Li S P, et al. Nano Energy,2018,46,176.
32 Yang T, Zheng J, Cheng Q, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces,2017,9,21773.
33 Zhang J J, Zang X, Wen H J, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A,2017,5,4940.
34 Płcharski J, Weiczorek W. Solid State Ionics,1988,28-30,979.
35 Nairn K M, Best A S, Newman P J, et al. Solid State Ionics,1999,121,115.
36 Chen S J, Zhao Y R, Yang J, et al. Ionics,2017,23,2603.
37 Nairn K, Forsyth M, Every H, et al. Solid State Ionics,1996,86-88,589.
38 Wang Y J, Pan Y, Chen L. Materials Chemistry and Physics,2005,92,354.
39 Wang Y J, Pan Y, Kim D. Journal of Power Sources,2006,159,690.
40 Jung Y C, Lee S M, Choi J H, et al. Journal of the Electrochemical Society,2015,162,A704.
41 Zhao Y, Huang Z, Chen S, et al. Solid State Ionics,2016,295,65.
42 Zhai H, Xu P, Ning M, et al. Nano Letters,2017,17,3182.
43 Liu W, Liu N, Sun J, et al. Nano Letters,2015,15,2740.
44 Liu W, Lee S W, Lin D C, et al. Nature Energy,2017,2,17035.
45 Bae J, Li Y T, Zhang J, et al. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition,2018,57,2096.
46 Buvana P, Vishista K, Shanmukaraj D, et al. Ionics,2017,23,541.
47 Appetecchi G B, Croce F, Dautzenberg G, et al. Journal of the Electrochemical Society,1998,145,4126.
48 Wang H G, Yuan S, Ma D L, et al. Energy & Environmental Science,2015,8,1660.
49 Appetecchi G B, Croce F, Hassoun J, et al. Journal of Power Sources,2003,114,105.
50 Jeon J D, Kwak S Y, Cho B W. Journal of the Electrochemical Society,2005,152,A1583.
51 Zhang D, Xu X, Qin Y, et al. Chemistry-A European Journal,2020,26,1720.
52 Nagao M, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M. Electrochimica Acta,2011,56,6055.
53 Kinoshita S, Okuda K, Machida N, et al. Solid State Ionics,2014,256,97.
54 Yu C, van Eijck L, Ganapathy S, et al. Electrochimica Acta,2016,215,93.
55 Nagao M, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M. Journal of Materials Chemistry,2012,22,10015.
56 Suzuki K, Kato D, Hara K, et al. Electrochimica Acta,2017,258,110.
57 Nagao M, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M. Energy Technology,2013,1,186.
58 Eom M, Son S, Park C, et al. Electrochimica Acta,2017,230,279.
59 Han F, Yue J, Fan X, et al. Nano Letters,2016,16,4521.
60 Yao X, Liu D, Wang C, et al. Nano Letters,2016,16,7148.
61 Wang Y, Lu D, Bowden M, et al. Chemistry of Materials,2018,30,990.
62 Yao H R, Yin Y X, Guo Y G. Chinese Physics B,2016,25.
63 Yao X, Huang N, Han F, et al. Advanced Energy Materials,2017,7,1602923.
64 Zhang Y B, Liu T, Zhang Q H, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A,2018,6,23345.
65 Nagao M, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M, et al. Journal of Power Sources,2015,274,471.
66 Sheng O W, Jin C B, Luo J M, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A,2017,5,12934.
67 Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Bakenov Z, et al. Solid State Ionics,2013,234,40.
68 Fu A, Wang C, Pei F, et al. Small,2019,15,1804786.
69 Liang J, Sun Z H, Li F, et al. Energy Storage Materials,2016,2,76.
70 Sakuda A, Sato Y, Hayashi A, et al. Energy Technology,2019,7,1900077.
71 Nagao M, Imade Y, Narisawa H, et al. Journal of Power Sources,2013,222,237.
72 Yan H, Wang H, Wang D, et al. Nano Letters,2019,19,3280.
73 Han Q G, Li X L, Shi X X, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A,2019,7,3895.
74 Yersak T A, Son S B, Cho J S, et al. Journal of the Electrochemical So-ciety,2013,160,A1497.
75 Zhang W B, Schroder D, Arlt T, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A,2017,5,9929.
76 Zhang W, Weber D A, Weigand H, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces,2017,9,17835.
77 Koerver R, Zhang W B, de Biasi L, et al. Energy & Environmental Science,2018,11,2142.
78 Suzuki K, Mashimo N, Ikeda Y, et al. ACS Applied Energy Materials,2018,1,2373.
79 Ohno S, Koerver R, Dewald G, et al. Chemistry of Materials,2019,31,2930.
80 Zhu Y, He X, Mo Y. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces,2015,7,23685.
81 Liu Y, Sun Q, Zhao Y, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces,2018,10,31240.
82 Chung H, Kang B. Chemistry of Materials,2017,29,8611.
83 Lau J, DeBlock R H, Butts D M, et al. Advanced Energy Materials,2018,8,1800933.
84 Wang B Q, Liu J, Sun Q, et al. Nanotechnology,2014,25,504007.
85 Zhao Y, Zheng K, Sun X L. Joule,2018,2,2583.
86 Cheng Q, Li A, Li N, et al. Joule,2019,3,1510.
87 Zhou W, Wang S, Li Y, et al. Journal of the American Chemical Society,2016,138,9385.
88 Hou G, Ma X, Sun Q, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces,2018,10,18610.
89 Wang C, Zhao Y, Sun Q, et al. Nano Energy,2018,53,168.
90 Zhang Z, Chen S, Yang J, et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces,2018,10,2556.
91 Gao Y, Wang D, Li Y C, et al. Angewandte Chemie International Edition,2018,57,13608.
92 Zhou T, Shen J, Wang Z, et al. Advanced Functional Materials,2020,30,1909159.
93 Nie K, Hong Y, Qiu J, et al. Frontiers in Chemistry,DOI:10.3389/fchem.2018.00616.
94 Santhanagopalan D, Qian D, McGilvray T, et al. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters,2014,5,298.
95 Park K, Yu B C, Jung J W, et al. Chemistry of Materials,2016,28,8051.
96 Walther F, Koerver R, Fuchs T, et al. Chemistry of Materials,2019,31,3745.
97 Okumura T, Nakatsutsumi T, Ina T, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry,2011,21,10051.
98 Hakari T, Deguchi M, Mitsuhara K, et al. Chemistry of Materials,2017,29,4768.
99 Liang J N, Sun Q, Zhao Y, et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry A,2018,6,23712.
100 Wang C, Adair K R, Liang J, et al. Advanced Functional Materials,2019,29,1900392.
101 Wu B B, Wang S Y, Lochala J, et al. Energy & Environmental Science,2018,11,1803.
102 Liang J Y, Zeng X X, Zhang X D, et al. Journal of the American Che-mical Society,2018,140,6767.
103 Ma C, Cheng Y, Yin K, et al. Nano Letters,2016,16,7030.
104 Wang Z, Santhanagopalan D, Zhang W, et al. Nano Letters,2016,16,3760.
105 Gong Y, Zhang J, Jiang L, et al. Journal of the American Chemical So-ciety,2017,139,4274.
106 Li X N, Liang J W, Li X, et al. Energy & Environmental Science,2018,11,2828.
107 Wu X H, Villevieille C, Novak P, et al. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics,2018,20,11123.
108 Wang C, Li X, Zhao Y, et al. Small Methods,2019,3,1900261.