Materials Reports 2019, Vol. 33 Issue (z1): 436-439 |
METALS AND METAL MATRIX COMPOSITES |
|
|
|
|
|
Influence of Inclusion Shape on the Stress and Strain Distribution at the Interface of Inclusion and Matrix |
LIU Xinling1,2,3, TAO Chunhu1,2,3 , WANG Tianyu1,2,3
|
1 AVIC Failure Analysis Center, Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Aeronautical Materials Testing and Evaluation, Beijing 100095 3 Aviation Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Materials Testing and Evaluation, Beijing 100095 |
|
|
Abstract The shape of inclusion has obvious influence on the crack initiation of powder superalloy. The influence of inclusion shape on stress & strain distribution was researched for inclusions with the same size and same position by Function of Complex Variables of elastic theory. The results show that the variation of inclusion shapes has clearly effect on the stress & strain distribution. When inclusion shape is ellipse, the normal stress of inclusion-matrix interface, the angular θ, and the maximum plastic strain may increase with the increase of the elliptic half axis parallel to the loading direction, the elliptic half axis perpendicular to the loading direction decrease. When inclusion shape is not the ellipse but the polygon, there are stress singularities at the corner joint of polygon. At this time, stress intensity factor was used to represent the stress field of polygon corner joint.
|
Published: 05 July 2019
|
|
About author:: Xinling Liu received her Ph.D. degree in materials science from the Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials in Sep. 2005—Jan. 2008. She has published more than 40 journal papers and three professional books as the first author. In addition, she acquired three provincial and ministerial awards. Her research interests focus on the failure analysis and prevention, safety and life prediction, fractography quantitative analysis, failure analysis expert system, and fracture characteristics and damage mechanism of advanced superalloys. |
|
|
1 Eric S Huron,Paul G Roth. Superalloys,USA,1996, pp.359. 2 Shamblen C E. Metallurgical Transaction B,1985,168,775. 3 Bussac A. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structure,1994,17,1319. 4 国为民,陈淦生,张凤戈.金属学报,1999,35(2),355. 5 邹金文,汪武祥.粉末冶金技术,2001,19(1),7. 6 刘新灵, 胡春燕, 王天宇.失效分析与预防,2018,13(2), 89. 7 田帅. 异质材料界面强度的理论与数值分析. 硕士学位论文, 扬州大学,2013. 8 丁学杉. 三维界面应力奇异性及界面断裂分析. 硕士学位论文, 东北大学,2013. 9 师俊平, 杨成, 解敏. 西安理工大学学报,2004,20(4),347. 10 戴瑛, 嵇醒.中国科学 G辑: 物理学 力学 天文学,2007,37(4),535. 11 吴萍, 张廷波, 黄摸佳. 南昌大学学报(理科版),2009,33(2),138. 12 Lee B J, Mear M E. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids,1999,47, 1301. 13 Dai-hengchen, Seiji Naka Michi. International Journal of Fracture,1996,82, 131. 14 许金泉,金烈侯,丁浩江.力学季刊,1996(17),104. 15 Chen D H , Nisitani H. Journal of Applied Mechanics,1993,60,607. 16 王天宇. 粉末高温合金缺陷定量评价及萌生寿命预测方法研究. 硕士学位论文,北京航空材料研究院, 2016. |
|
|
|