Abstract: The construction and optimization of bursting layer plays a significant role in the development of defensive fortifications. The honeycomb bursting layer made of steel fiber reinforced high strength concrete-filled steel tube is a new type of bursting layer with high impact resistance. In this paper, a dynamic mechanical test and a numerical simulation for a lab-prepared steel fiber reinforced high strength concrete-filled steel tube were conducted by using a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) set-up and the kinetic finite element analysis software LS-DYNA, respectively. The steel fiber content and tube thickness of the high strength concrete filled steel tubes for impact compression test were set at 0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5% and 2 mm, 3 mm, respectively. The results showed that steel fiber reinforced high strength concrete-filled steel tube exhibits strain rate strengthening effect, as higher strain rates corresponded to greater dynamic compressive strengths. When the air pressure was 1.0 MPa, the specimen with 3 mm tube thickness and 1.5% steel fiber content achieved a dynamic compressive strength of 258.3 MPa. Compared with steel fiber reinforced high strength concrete, the steel fiber reinforced high strength concrete filled-steel tube possesses better impact compression perfor-mance, as the maximum relative increase of dynamic compressive strength reached 35.4%, also the ability to withstand repeated impact compressions. The numerical simulation coincided well with the experimental results, which confirmed the feasibility of the numerical simulation method.
李季, 石少卿, 何秋霖, 王起帆. 钢管钢纤维高强混凝土抗冲击压缩性能的试验研究与数值模拟*[J]. CLDB, 2017, 31(23): 125-131.
LI Ji, SHI Shaoqing, HE Qiulin, WANG Qifan. Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation on the Impact Compression Performance of Steel Fiber Reinforced High Strength Concrete-filled Steel Tube. Materials Reports, 2017, 31(23): 125-131.
1 Ren Xingtao, Zhou Tingqing, Zhong Fangping. Dynamic mechanical behavior of steel-fiber reactive powder concrete[J]. Explosion Shock Waves, 2011, 31(5):540(in Chinese). 任兴涛, 周听清, 钟方平, 等. 钢纤维活性粉末混凝土的动态力学性能[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2011, 31(5):540. 2 Shan Jianhua. Experimental study and finite element analysis of concrete filled steel tube under impact loading[D]. Chngsha:Hunan University, 2007(in Chinese). 单建华. 钢管混凝土在冲击荷载作用下实验研究和有限元分析[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2007. 3 Zhu Qian. Study on static and impact resistance of RPC steel stub columns[D]. Xi??an: Changan University, 2014(in Chinese). 朱倩. 钢管RPC短柱静力及抗冲击性能研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2014. 4 Chen Junling, Shu Wenya, Li Jinwei, et al. Experimental study on dynamic mechanical property of Q235 steel at different strain rates[J]. J Tongji University(Nat Sci), 2016, 44(7):1071(in Chinese). 陈俊岭, 舒文雅, 李金威, 等. Q235钢材在不同应变率下力学性能的试验研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(7):1071. 5 Zhang Hua, Gao Yuwei, Li Fei, et al. Experimental study on dynamic properties and constitutive model of polypropylene fiber concrete under high strain rate[J]. J Central South University(Sci Technol), 2013(8):3464(in Chinese). 张华, 郜余伟, 李飞, 等. 高应变率下聚丙烯纤维混凝土动态力学性能和本构模型[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013(8):3464. 6 Shemirani A B, Naghdabadi R, Ashrafi M J. Experimental and numerical study on choosing proper pulse shapers for testing concrete specimens by split Hopkinson pressure bar apparatus[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2016, 125:326. 7 Xia K, Yao W. Dynamic rock tests using split Hopkinson (Kolsky) bar system—A review[J]. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng, 2015, 7:27. 8 Zhong W Z, Rusinek A, Jankowiak T, et al. Influence of interfacial friction and specimen configuration in split Hopkinson pressure bar system[J]. Tribology Int, 2015, 90:1. 9 Pang Shumeng, Huan Shi, Tao Weijun, et al. Mesoscopic numerical study on steel fiber reinforced concrete under impact loading[J]. J Guangzhou University(Nat Sci Ed), 2015, 14(1):61(in Chinese). 庞书孟, 浣石, 陶为俊, 等. 冲击荷载下钢纤维混凝土的细观数值研究[J]. 广州大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 14(1):61. 10 Chen Bofei, Qiu Xin, Chen Jiangying. Numerical simulation of concrete impact test using split Hopkinson pressure bundled bars device[J]. Chin J Appl Mech, 2017, 34(1):125 (in Chinese). 陈博斐, 邱欣, 陈江瑛. 混凝土SHPB束杆装置冲击实验的数值仿真[J]. 应用力学学报, 2017, 34(1):125. 11 Durand B, Delvare F, Bailly P, et al. A split Hopkinson pressure bar device to carry out confined friction tests under high pressures[J]. Int J Impact Eng, 2016, 88:54. 12 Barr A D, Clarke S D, Rigby S E, et al. Design of a split Hopkinson pressure bar with partial lateral confinement[J]. Measurement Sci Technol, 2016, 27(12):125903. 13 Wang Yonghua, Liang Xiaoyan, Wang Zhengdao, et al. Experimental study on the impact compressive behavior of reactive powder concrete[J]. Eng Mech, 2008, 25(11):167(in Chinese). 王勇华, 梁小燕, 王正道, 等. 活性粉末混凝土冲击压缩性能实验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2008, 25(11):167. 14 Jiang Guoping, Xiao Sanxia. SHPB experimental study of the late-ral effect under impact loading[J]. Concrete, 2015(12):1 (in Chinese). 蒋国平, 肖三霞. 混凝土材料惯性力效应SHPB实验研究[J]. 混凝土, 2015(12):1. 15 Chakraborty T, Mishra S, Loukus J, et al. Characterization of three Himalayan rocks using a split Hopkinson pressure bar[J]. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci, 2016, 85:112.